9/11 Conspiracies

[Soulboy]

Whether 9/11 was a conspiracy or not, that may never be proven... but there is no doubt that some things don't quite add up... and the premise for the 9/11 attack, whereby the USA "start" a war against an enemy is a well recorded approach that the CIA considered in the 1960's.

The documentation is there that the USA considered something along these lines many years ago to justify them taking action against an enemy (Cuba), so the thinking behind it all is not exactly fantasy.

 

[Mayor West]

A few suspicious thing just off the top of my head:

The fighter jets sent to intercept one of the airliners were sent from an airfield much much further away than where they could have been sent form, thus far extending the time to reach the airliner.

As mentioned before in this thread, an almost fully intact passport of one of the hijackers conveniently found on NYC streets.

WTC7 collapsing with relatively little damage, which just so happened to contain important documentation (not entirely sure what this was regarding without re-reading the books).

There are many many more which when you read them you just think there was no way, even the US government, could be that incompetent.

 

[buzzer1]

Whether 9/11 was a conspiracy or not, that may never be proven... but there is no doubt that some things don't quite add up... and the premise for the 9/11 attack, whereby the USA "start" a war against an enemy is a well recorded approach that the CIA considered in the 1960's.

The documentation is there that the USA considered something along these lines many years ago to justify them taking action against an enemy (Cuba), so the thinking behind it all is not exactly fantasy.

Operation Northwoods mate?


<a class="postlink" href="http://noolmusic.com/google_videos/uss_liberty_attacked_in_an_operation_northwoods_false_flag_.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://noolmusic.com/google_videos/uss_ ... _flag_.php</a>

 

[Mayor West]

Whether 9/11 was a conspiracy or not, that may never be proven... but there is no doubt that some things don't quite add up... and the premise for the 9/11 attack, whereby the USA "start" a war against an enemy is a well recorded approach that the CIA considered in the 1960's.

The documentation is there that the USA considered something along these lines many years ago to justify them taking action against an enemy (Cuba), so the thinking behind it all is not exactly fantasy.

Yes i read that too, as sick as it sounds (and im not saying i fully believe it) the US government are probably more than capable of considering such loss of life as collateral damage for an excuse to start a war.<br /><br />-- Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:16 am --<br /><br />

Whether 9/11 was a conspiracy or not, that may never be proven... but there is no doubt that some things don't quite add up... and the premise for the 9/11 attack, whereby the USA "start" a war against an enemy is a well recorded approach that the CIA considered in the 1960's.

The documentation is there that the USA considered something along these lines many years ago to justify them taking action against an enemy (Cuba), so the thinking behind it all is not exactly fantasy.

Operation Northwoods mate?


<a class="postlink" href="http://noolmusic.com/google_videos/uss_liberty_attacked_in_an_operation_northwoods_false_flag_.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://noolmusic.com/google_videos/uss_ ... _flag_.php</a>

Brilliant video

 

[Lucky Toma]

I edited my post Mr Phelan sir because it was a direct response to a huge kick-off on here between two members. Once that dispute had been deleted my response appeared disproportionate and unfair towards yourself so I simply added a line to explain this.
Why on earth would I be reprimanded for accusing you of being a WUM?

I am genuinely sorry to hear about your loss on that horrible day and I too have little time for conspiracy theories on the subject matter.

From the anger within your last posting it is very obvious that you feel genuine anger towards the percieved moral legitimacy of espousing such views. To choose to compare and contrast such legitimacy with holocaust deniers is unnecessary and being purposefully incendiary IMO. But at least your ire appears genuine in this instance.

But lets just see shall we.

Lets see what your next thread will be about.
Will it touch upon any one of the thousands upon thousands of topics included in this complex and wonderful world that wont cause disharmony and emotive disagreements between forum members? Or will it touch upon a subject matter guarenteed to divide and create upset? Which thus far certainly appears to be your modus operandi since you joined.

 

[Skashion]

One of my favourite conspiracies has got to be Titanic. Really interesting that one. Not many people have heard of it either, strangely.

 

[mat]

One of my favourite conspiracies has got to be Titanic. Really interesting that one. Not many people have heard of it either, strangely.

100 year anniversary soon. Bound to reappear, is that the insurance scam one?

 

[Skashion]

One of my favourite conspiracies has got to be Titanic. Really interesting that one. Not many people have heard of it either, strangely.

100 year anniversary soon. Bound to reappear, is that the insurance scam one?

Aye.

 

[buzzer1]

I edited my post Mr Phelan sir because it was a direct response to a huge kick-off on here between two members. Once that dispute had been deleted my response appeared disproportionate and unfair towards yourself so I simply added a line to explain this.
Why on earth would I be reprimanded for accusing you of being a WUM?

I am genuinely sorry to hear about your loss on that horrible day and I too have little time for conspiracy theories on the subject matter.

From the anger within your last posting it is very obvious that you feel genuine anger towards the percieved moral legitimacy of espousing such views. To choose to compare and contrast such legitimacy with holocaust deniers is unnecessary and being purposefully incendiary IMO. But at least your ire appears genuine in this instance.

But lets just see shall we.

Lets see what your next thread will be about.
Will it touch upon any one of the thousands upon thousands of topics included in this complex and wonderful world that wont cause disharmony and emotive disagreements between forum members? Or will it touch upon a subject matter guarenteed to divide and create upset? Which thus far certainly appears to be your modus operandi since you joined.

Toma, the k/o has been boxed now, i think you will be referring to me and a.n.other? this is;nt a pissing contest but i must say this for the last time, i was away from my P.C. all day and came into an assasination of my character by 2 seperate people on 2 seperate threads, it was a retaliation from an innocent party, me. Although this will never ever happen again, each to their own beliefs i say and live and let live. Peace.

 

[Lucky Toma]

I know mate. And I'm sorry for bringing it up after its all been done and dusted.
But Terryphelan would be unaware that anything at all occured and I wanted him to know that posting the things that he does has consequences.



(Although I suspect that he is perfectly aware of this already which is precisely why he chooses such emotive topics)