You're probably right that if he tried to do what he did, he would have failed, however he was probably trying to do something else and his failure to do that could have ended in any number of possible outcomes and this was just one of those possibilities.The first paragraph yes asks questions the latter two are facts, The pilot of whatever aircraft hit the Pentagon chose to do so in the most ineffective and most difficult possible manner...a bloke with a few hours on a single engined Cessna simply could not have done it.
You're probably right that if he tried to do what he did, he would have failed, however he was probably trying to do something else and his failure to do that could have ended in any number of possible outcomes and this was just one of those possibilities.
You probably need to read about the construction of the Pentagon during WW2 and you'll find you're spouting bollocks.Difficult to see what he could have possibly been trying for the result being what it was.....
Two further points that are more or less my opinion but others have stated and I cannot disagree. I am far from convinced that a 767 travelling at 400-450 mph would actually penetrate the outer wall of the Pentagon. Lets not forget that you can go on any military airfield in many countries that have hardened aircraft hangers that normal run of the mill bombs cannot penetrate....they have to use special bunker busting bombs designed specifically for the job. Are we to believe that the Pentagon wall was made of inferior stuff than these? Really. As someone mentioned airliners are fairly fragile things....
Many questions have been rightly asked about the lack of evidence of two big engines hitting the wall, from what I could see when the reports came through as it happened we can only assume someone removed the engines prior to the fateful flight and it was infact propelled by Allah....which of course would explain how it was flown which such accuracy that it would have reduced Guy Gibson to a mere wannabe.
Conspiracy...call it what you will but the Pentagon attack really does emit a strong stench of rodent!
You probably need to read about the construction of the Pentagon during WW2 and you'll find you're spouting bollocks.
Couple of quick questions about the Pentagon theory that I've never really understood. If it was a missile, who do the conspiracy theorists think fired it and for what reason? And if a missile hit it, what happened to Flight 77 and its passengers?So why wasnt it shown...why has it still not been shown...after all it was a civilian airliner that hit the Pentagon wasnt it? No different than the ones that hit the WTC....you can see those impacts, why is this different as you say its inconceivable that no other cctv caught this aircraft. Unless the aircraft/missile looked nothing like a boeing 767 of course there is no earthly reason not to show images of it on its final decent to its target.
Again the key thing here is why did the pilot not dive into the Pentagon rather than choosing to hit the building where least damage would occur to the building that also happened to involve flying a course that some bloke with a few hours on a single engines Cessna and none on a boeing 767 most certainly could not. It is these facts that absolutely prove that there is something to hide with this particular attack.
So I dont know what hit the Pentagon but whatever it was was not flown by whom it is claimed. Neither was it flown to inflict maximum damage...nobody can dispute that it would have been far easier and caused more damage by flying it into the inner layers of the Pentagon...these are facts that can simply not be debunked.
I would say at least one part of it has been rebuilt after it was hit by a plane in 2001.Could well be....as I say I dont know much about what the Pentagon is made up of...but I would be mildly surprised were it as it was when it was constructed.
Yeah, half-wits, mate. Just half wits...
Couple of quick questions about the Pentagon theory that I've never really understood. If it was a missile, who do the conspiracy theorists think fired it and for what reason? And if a missile hit it, what happened to Flight 77 and its passengers?[/QUOTE
Well if it were a missile it would most probably have been fired by a B1 or B52, a few hundred miles away, why one should do such a thing is of course is another matter.....but at the end of the day Bush wanted justification to go after Saddam 9/11 gave it too him, a little "hollywood" to get the nation onside isnt unheard of is it?