west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,434
Did you bother watching the video posted by jay_mcfc or do you just stick to ones that reinforce your own convictions?So basically, we're expected to assume that metallurgists and chemists that are teaching in universities are either lying or completely wrong when they say that the dust samples contained high levels of thermite. That structural engineers that also give lectures in seats of learning insist that the official version that one corner support pillar weakening would cause a building to go into freefall on it's own footprint is nonsense are also wrong?
It would be career suicide.
A politician, a government agent or a head of a company wouldn't be subjected to the same consequences
Especially if they had assurances that they'd never have to prove their case in a public court of law. Nobody, however high profile they are, despite all the accusations they've made, has been prosecuted. A court has to be presented with evidence for and against. For some reason, they don't have an appetite for that.
As there is nothing that will convince you or any of the other "truthers" on here that you might be wrong, I'm out.