While he was munching on a Barm.It was Quinn who said stupendous.
While he was munching on a Barm.It was Quinn who said stupendous.
The event has been investigated in great detail and the account of what happened that day is not full of holes. All the legitimate and most of the stupid questions that have been raised have been answered and the reports have been updated as more information has become available. Try googling "truther" and you'll find that the definition is Are you denying that?
ExactlyThe conspiracy theories have more holes in them than the actual true events.
x2Exactly
Yes. 9/11 was used as an excuse for Iraq but if someone was going to set up a real conspiracy for it they'd have gone for something Iraq related.We all know 9/11 happened because Bush wanted to invade Iraq. Look it up, his administration was drawing up plans for an excuse to invade Iraq from Day 1. Some members of his administration who also worked for his dad held a grudge against his dad for not finishing off Hussein. I'm not saying 9/11 was an inside job, but wouldn't be surprised if some crook in the higher echelons helped the terrorists out. You can't tell me a bunch of cavemen managed to hit 3 targets perfectly with a plane all alone.
And don't get me started on those numpties who still believe we went to Iraq to give their people democracy!
WTC 7 is the elephant in the room in all of this but for those that are convinced it was a demolition job, watch a video on YouTube about debunking WTC 7. It's pretty convincing that it may not have been a demolition. Basically, conspiracies only ever show the building from the north and west side where it looks like it's in a relatively good condition. However, the South side, where the damage was caused from the collapse of the towers, was a mess. There was one corner where the damage affected about 20 floors and when you see it you will understand why it collapsed. Also, the building was a much more open structure without the steel beams running through the inside of the building, hence the collapsing within itself.
In terms of the fire, again it looks a lot worse from the south side and it was blazing for 7/8 hours quite high up in the building. On the debunk video there are videos and photos that show just how bad the fire was.
That's a great, really informative video (some good tunes as well).
I must admit I had some suspicions about the official version of events for WTC7 after watching some conspiracy documentaries but that video has cleared it all up for me.
It's not puzzling at all. There wasn't a controlled demolition (as I'm sure you're aware). The loud bangs were probably large steel girders snapping.I know people have claimed there was loud bangs before the collapse of both towers, but what I find puzzling is you can't hear the distinctive bangs you get from controlled explosions. They would of been clear as day on some of the videos captured.
I know people have claimed there was loud bangs before the collapse of both towers, but what I find puzzling is you can't hear the distinctive bangs you get from controlled explosions. They would of been clear as day on some of the videos captured.