9/11 documentary now

A few quite significant differences.

Neither the Address Hotel or the Beijing Television Cultural Center (the building containing the Mandarin Oriental Hotel) sustained serious structural damage by being hit by a large passenger aircraft or by a large part of an adjacent building prior to the fires.

The official version is that fires caused WTC 7 to collapse, not structural damage.

Secondly both these buildings were a predominantly concrete construction which is more resistant to fire.
https://structurae.net/structures/the-address-downtown-dubai

Yeah - resistant. Not immune.

Thirdly, the fire brigades of Dubai and Beijing fought those fires.

Fire-fighters fought the fires in building 7. It still collapsed.

Finally, these fires were mostly at the outer surface of the buildings...

Like Building 7, you mean - the one that collapsed?

unlike the fires at the WTC which were at the core of the buildings.

Evidence of fires within the buildings' cores is scant. NIST found only two core column specimens in a condition allowing paint-analysis inferences about temperatures reached.

Finally, these fires were mostly at the outer surface of the buildings unlike the fires at the WTC which were at the core of the buildings.

Unlike building 7 - which still collapsed.
 
Last edited:
Why when you question something are you a conspiracy theorist. Do people honestly believe everything the government is telling them is the truth? The same government that lied about saddam having weapons of mass destruction told us 911 was conceived and executed by a man in a cave in Afganistan.
 
Because that's not how controlled demolitions work. And they are isolated one-off bangs in that they are not occurring in sequence, which is what happens in controlled demolitions.

Im glad someone explained it. Them bangs on that video Jim posted sound nothing like a controlled explosion. There isn't one video where continuous bangs are heard just before the collapse of either tower. Neither tower collapses are from a controlled explosion, I can't see why people think it is.
 
Because that's not how controlled demolitions work.

Who said those particular explosions are initiating a demolition?

There is countless eyewitness testimony of explosions and flashes just before the building collapsed:



A demolition expert says these reports are consistent with controlled demolition:

 
Who said those particular explosions are initiating a demolition?

There is countless eyewitness testimony of explosions and flashes just before the building collapsed:



A demolition expert says these reports are consistent with controlled demolition:


So the experts they wheeled out were an explosives loader (a guy who places explosives where he's told), a fire fighter (from Seattle) and a Maths teacher (with a grey beard to add credibility).
Of course there were loads of explosions from when the aircraft hit to the start of the collapse. Obviously nothing to do with aviation fuel gushing down liftshafts, electrical substations shorting out, steel beams snapping etc. etc. Clearly they were all part of a controlled demolition!

Those experts were nearly as good as your whistle blowers on the other page.
A disgruntled former CIA employee spouting her mouth off on Russia Today with a big smirk on her face.
A documentary made by a well known conspiracy theorist about a dead guy.
Best of all, a retired general who watched it on TV and did his own investigation using a few photos.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.