KDB aside we are completely risk averse these days.You could screen shot 50+ of these through the season that we haven’t played in for Haaland. Unacceptable from our players. Just what the fuck are they playing at?
Exactly this, you could make at least three of these freeze frames every game so one of two things are happeningPlayers should have more trust in themselves and at least TRY to give Haaland these balls...
Haaland vs goalkeeper is VERY VERY likely to score, so sometimes it's worth trying more difficult passes. Safe passes the whole game makes sense while using false 9, City now have a proper finisher...
View attachment 68191View attachment 68190View attachment 68189
Did you know the players get fined if they score a goal being more than 5 yards out ; )I would have thought that after spending most of the game not being played in, he would have taken a shot from roughly 20 yards out, but he laid it off left. Was odd.
Tbh I saw that as a good thing, because even when frustrated he still made the right decision to get the ball wide and then get in the box. It’s not his fault our wingers are useless at creating chances for him. They need to do better when given the ball 1 v 1 with their opponent.I would have thought that after spending most of the game not being played in, he would have taken a shot from roughly 20 yards out, but he laid it off left. Was odd.
was shouting at my screen "pass".... most lethal player in world football but you cant create any chances with our arsenal of players. frustrating to say the least. zero risk won't get you anywhere.Players should have more trust in themselves and at least TRY to give Haaland these balls...
Haaland vs goalkeeper is VERY VERY likely to score, so sometimes it's worth trying more difficult passes. Safe passes the whole game makes sense while using false 9, City now have a proper finisher...
View attachment 68191View attachment 68190View attachment 68189
yeah i see your point, i just thought he might test the keeper properly but alas.Tbh I saw that as a good thing, because even when frustrated he still made the right decision to get the ball wide and then get in the box. It’s not his fault our wingers are useless at creating chances for him. They need to do better when given the ball 1 v 1 with their opponent.
Like I said, Kane would suit our style far more than Haaland does or is likely ever to. Kane's best attribute other than his finishing is his ability to drop deep and get involved, linking play and rolling defenders. Son has been awful this season and Kane is having his best goal-scoring season for years.
Also, what part of "We don't play to his strengths" do you not quite understand?
We were boring as fuck with a False 9 for two years. Gundo had to rescue one of those seasons by outscoring all of our forwards.
I totally agree, but Peps blueprint has always been based on ball possession deep in the opponents half. That won’t change. Peps fantasy team is a team of midfielders. That’s not Haaland.At the end of the day, Haaland's game, his strengths, means he is simply far better suited to a counter attacking side than one that focuses on ball possession and ball recycling. It's why Dortmund were such a good fit for him. He can adapt his game a little and we can adapt ours a little to help him, but it will take time.
Other teams adjusted to him and he's been screened by both CBs for most of the game. Pep sacrificed the formation because of him, so other teams even stopped defending with back five. Just cover Haaland with CBs and press a possible outlet to him and usually it is Kev only. Compared to a couple of season ago - even a year ago - we sometimes look playing with two players down in attacking phase of the game. The number of chances we create is down, the number total shots is down and the ratio of shots /shots on goal is dropping ever lower. But, why Pep changed the tactics and formation so much remains mystery to me. He might've been unnerved by Arsenal form, or the incoming WC, but something snapped and we look totally crooked.xG 0,00 last game. First 8 matches he had 66 touches. Last 8 has been 33.
Why buy a player who doesn’t suit your system unless you’re prepared to make the most of him and adapt?I totally agree, but Peps blueprint has always been based on ball possession deep in the opponents half. That won’t change. Peps fantasy team is a team of midfielders. That’s not Haaland.
Do you think the Curchella signing was supposed to be part of this an overlapping left back? Maybe Pep had plans to try and do this but it fell away with that signing not happening Zinchenko going and Gomez it seems a complete bust.Why buy a player who doesn’t suit your system unless you’re prepared to make the most of him and adapt?
200 million, well that’s 150 million profit then, that will buy a few top class players then, bloody idiotsI see Spanish outlet Nacional are talking up rumours of a breakdown ("divorce") between Haaland and Pep. And that Real Madrid are "very attentive" to the situation, but are willing to wait until the release clause comes into effect next year. Didn’t take long, did it?
![]()
Haaland to 'divorce' Man City as his 'anger' with Guardiola sees their relationship 'crack'
Erling Haaland is reportedly ready to 'divorce' Man City as he has a 'very distant' relationship with Pep Guardiola, who has created a 'bad atmosphere'.www.football365.com
Most of what you’re saying is right regarding the formation but in big games like against the scum and Spurs when he makes runs the ball should have been played a fair few times. Worst case it’s over hit and their keeper gets it. Big deal. Get the past right and there’s a good chance he scores. The examples we’ve seen in these games when the pass has been on but we play our umpteenth square pass the risk reward has been worth trying to play Haaland in. We still lose the ball eventually playing this new found slow pragmatic style as 100% possession might be Pep’s wet dream these days but is obviously impossible. The lack of shots on target and chances created in these games shows something needs to change.Other teams adjusted to him and he's been screened by both CBs for most of the game. Pep sacrificed the formation because of him, so other teams even stopped defending with back five. Just cover Haaland with CBs and press a possible outlet to him and usually it is Kev only. Compared to a couple of season ago - even a year ago - we sometimes look playing with two players down in attacking phase of the game. The number of chances we create is down, the number total shots is down and the ratio of shots /shots on goal is dropping ever lower. But, why Pep changed the tactics and formation so much remains mystery to me. He might've been unnerved by Arsenal form, or the incoming WC, but something snapped and we look totally crooked.
I am sick of seeing it on TV or people posting it here Haaland running and there are all these arrows superimposed of possible through-passes, when in reality less that 20% of them would be successful. And people would then scream we are giving away too many balls, or that we are too hasty in our execution when attacking.