BlueMoonRisin’
Well-Known Member
He is indeed (analytical) quality and argumentative, and he knows his onions. Just don't ask him to get you any from Didsbury; )You are quality, an argumentative bugger , but you know your onions:)
He is indeed (analytical) quality and argumentative, and he knows his onions. Just don't ask him to get you any from Didsbury; )You are quality, an argumentative bugger , but you know your onions:)
Hasn't he?. As someone posted yesterday, if you are assessing him against what you want him to do rather than what Pep wants from him, then there is likely going to be a difference.And ? That should have been his agueroooooo moment and he should have kicked on , he hasnt
He is brazils number nine , allegedlyHasn't he?. As someone posted yesterday, if you are assessing him against what you want him to do rather than what Pep wants from him, then there is likely going to be a difference.
I wouldn't be surprised if Pep replaces Aguero with another utility type forward like Jesus
and?He is brazils number nine , allegedly
He is a striker, we brought him because he is oneand?
Why though? Why do we need a striker like that? We're in line to go top of the table, sauntered through a CL group, and are in a cup final. Is not what we have working?He is a striker, we brought him because he is one
Sergio out he should have stepped up,aside from two games he hasnt , we clearly need a striker who demands the ball and scores goals
As mentioned a few moments ago, you are measuring him on what you want from him. Do you not concede, Pep might be utilising him totally differently?He is a striker, we brought him because he is one
Sergio out he should have stepped up,aside from two games he hasnt , we clearly need a striker who demands the ball and scores goals