samuelyeboah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2021
- Messages
- 6,927
- Team supported
- Manchester City
great overall game, but terrible terrible shooting the entire match. had a number of really good chances and fluffed them all.
Worked his bollocks off again. Certain others could learn a lot from this lad.
Who is it that could learn something ?
In the pub after the match in Aston, the Villa fans said it was incredible how hard City players work
So who do you think doesn't?
Sterling has never been lazy. He has flaws in his game but poor workrate has never been one of them.Sterling or Mahrez are the only City players who get accused of being lazy, so it's one of those he means, take your pick.
Both run harder than Sergio or Yaya used to but that doesn't seem to matter.
Sterling has never been lazy. He has flaws in his game but poor workrate has never been one of them.
Incredible workrate and his assists are more than compensating for lack of domestic goals, 6 now in 11 starts.... he’s evolving his game to suit the need and it’s making him a more rounded player, one which is going to provide a stand out season on this trajectory, he’s world class imo, totally selfless for the need of the team, love him...
interestingly, it’s 19/34 for European outings, not too shabby for a poor finisher (:
He’s an excellent player and the fact he is being more regularly used as a wide player is benefitting him.
I think a lot of the criticisms aimed at him are because he’s no Aguero. It seems he was brought in to be his long-term successor but he doesn’t have that natural strikers instinct.
There was a moment yesterday when he brilliantly controlled the ball in the Villa area with a ridiculous first touch, only to blast the ball well wide when the chance presented itself.
In reality, that’s Gabby in a nutshell. He does the hard things well but wastes golden opportunities. Yet, he has a strikers instinct when getting assists. His cross to Bernie was brilliant.
Regardless of who we bring in as a striker, Gabby must stay.
It should be said that although he's currently an inconsistent finisher (to put it politely), he's exceptionally talented at getting himself into goalscoring positions and/or creating chances for himself. He'll always have decent goalscoring numbers at the very worst thanks to it.interestingly, it’s 19/34 for European outings, not too shabby for a poor finisher (:
So Gabby's not shabby?interestingly, it’s 19/34 for European outings, not too shabby for a poor finisher (:
He’s an excellent player and the fact he is being more regularly used as a wide player is benefitting him.
I think a lot of the criticisms aimed at him are because he’s no Aguero. It seems he was brought in to be his long-term successor but he doesn’t have that natural strikers instinct.
There was a moment yesterday when he brilliantly controlled the ball in the Villa area with a ridiculous first touch, only to blast the ball well wide when the chance presented itself.
In reality, that’s Gabby in a nutshell. He does the hard things well but wastes golden opportunities. Yet, he has a strikers instinct when getting assists. His cross to Bernie was brilliant.
Regardless of who we bring in as a striker, Gabby must stay.
Foden-Jesus-Mahrez for me.Should have started. Looked sharp when he came on but the game was already won and it was simply a keep ball game at that point.
Foden jesus sterling is imo the best front 3 we can put out right now.
Should have started. Looked sharp when he came on but the game was already won and it was simply a keep ball game at that point.
Foden jesus sterling is imo the best front 3 we can put out right now.
I see the merits in both.Foden-Jesus-Mahrez for me.
He's un-ironically our most clinical forward.
Wouldn't argue with that, was a toss up between the two right now for me, only opted for sterling because he has unique attributes the side lacks without him.Foden-Jesus-Mahrez for me.
He's un-ironically our most clinical forward.
as Pep said, it was an 'orange' card. Seems okay though.Really feared that he’d come off even worse after that challenge. Studs on the back of the heel AND the way his ankle torqued. I don’t think Cathcart intentionally tried to make that kind of challenge - I think it was just an intentional professional foul - but it was clumsy enough to become a challenge that was pretty nasty.
It won't happen in my life time, but there should be a sin bin/temporary suspension rule introduced for that type of foul, "orange" as Pep suggested. They are too dangerous for a mere yellow but a little short of worthy of a red.Really feared that he’d come off even worse after that challenge. Studs on the back of the heel AND the way his ankle torqued. I don’t think Cathcart intentionally tried to make that kind of challenge - I think it was just an intentional professional foul - but it was clumsy enough to become a challenge that was pretty nasty.