a little birdie...Torres et al...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hinchcliffe (62) said:
Neville Kneville said:
Just give them away if it's that important to move them on. Makes much more sense than getting rid of players we'd rather keep.


This

Great in theory but when you are paying the likes of Jo £50k per week you effectively cant give them away because no other mug will pay them that kind of cash. Unfortunately we are stuck with some players until their contracts run out! Danny Mills anyone?
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
bluesy said:
Yeah, can't see that myself. Can you imagine his final diary entry? Also he did a video interview recently. He's the one I think will make the cut defo.


Rubbish, means nothing.

Mark Hughes was in talks and secured a new deal for Zabaleta, 24 hours before he was pushed.

Clubs haven't made their own moves, as yet...to say Richards is out and out staying, would be wrong.

Probably shouldn't say...defo....ha. As we are just guessing though, I think he'll stay. Just a feeling but what do I know. I realize there will be surprises and some we won't like. What about M. Johnson? Think he'll get a chance?
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
Hinchcliffe (62) said:
I tend to disagree with your selection of outgoing players. I cant see RM getting rid of both Onuoha and Richards. My guess is Richards will stay. I also think that Ireland will stay unless he is part of package - e.g Torres - Ireland plus cash scenario. SWP - not sure about that one either as english and good cover. Don't forget we can loan these players out too.


The last few posts clearly demonstrate the argument of trying to shift "11" players out in a month will be no problem.

They are dead wood, but of sufficient quality. Half of the list will be nominal fees.

Ultimately, as stated, they were guesses.

However, on SWP, his contract continues to run down and there has been plenty of interest.

We either pay him, or we lose him.

I would like to see us keep swp. If we believe what the media said near end of season that swp was demanding more money like the other stars then I think we should put him in his place. Not only was his form poor at the time, nobody is bigger than the club. On the other hand he always states City is where his heart is - i'm now confused?
 
Dont forget Silvhino has gone too in the calculations.

which is a shame, I thought he would be a good defence coach for the youth team.
 
fbloke said:
AntonDonJuan said:
Etuhu is a complete cock

And he doesnt track back FFS!
I remember my bird phoned me about 6 months ago and said "Who's Kelvin Etuhu?" so i told her he played for city and she said "Oh my mates going out with him, she said he's a big time footballer and he's wadded etc" I explained to her he was absolutely shite, and she said he'd been giving it the big one to my bird's mate about how amazing he was and how he was gonna be a superstar. She finished with him about 2 weeks later and i quote, "Because he's an absolute twat"
 
r.soleofsalford said:
get rid of
bridge
jo
big phil
etuhu
rsc
possibly barry, ireland,


These are the important one's. I think it is important that we shed some of our big earners who aren't starters. Overall these are probably on about £300,000-350,000 grand a week. We need to replace the likes of Bridge with Garrido etc. If Kolorov will start then why even have Bridge, Garrido won't moan about being on the bench, he is young and on around £10,000 a week.
 
AntonDonJuan said:
fbloke said:
And he doesnt track back FFS!
I remember my bird phoned me about 6 months ago and said "Who's Kelvin Etuhu?" so i told her he played for city and she said "Oh my mates going out with him, she said he's a big time footballer and he's wadded etc" I explained to her he was absolutely shite, and she said he'd been giving it the big one to my bird's mate about how amazing he was and how he was gonna be a superstar. She finished with him about 2 weeks later and i quote, "Because he's an absolute twat"


like his brother
 
Bridge demonstrated at Chelsea, he will be more than happy to play back up, especially on his money.

A decent fall-back situation.

As is Lescott, who can also slot in during a match situation.

The implications for just releasing players seems to have been lost on a number of people.

You don't write-off an asset just like that. If the player keeps his mouth shut and does not demand a move, he is entitled to the remainder of his contract being paid up.

If you were to release even Jo, for example. Even if we took best part of £15m hit on original transfer fee.

At wages of say £50k a week for the next three years, old Joey would cost us more than the original transfer fee.
 
grunge said:
Dont forget Silvhino has gone too in the calculations.

which is a shame, I thought he would be a good defence coach for the youth team.
This, Slyvinho was a great professional and his English was amazing i thought. He had a great character and despite having played for Barca etc. He seemed very humble. Would have loved him to have a coaching role.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.