a little birdie...Torres et al...

[JoeMercer'sWay]

You cant ban someone for asking questions surely?! I know sometimes it can come accross as an attack but I bet there is plenty of people on here who want to know the answers to the questions some of these so called "ITK hounders" pose.

I have just gone back and had a look at the original post and it seems that Dzeko is our main target over Balotelli is this still the case? has Tolmie even mentioned Balotelli on here in any of his posts?

Perhaps the questions could have been asked via a pm?

Tolmie's never answered a PM I've sent him so to be fair I think for the majority any PM sent to him will fall on deaf ears.

 

[FinallyGamble]

More than most of us ? Do you live in Asia do you ?

 

[The Fixer]

Perhaps the questions could have been asked via a pm?

Tolmie's never answered a PM I've sent him so to be fair I think for the majority any PM sent to him will fall on deaf ears.

He does get swamped tbf but take your point.

 

[RazorH]

I don't care if I'm to be hounded off this site for asking the questions I asked.

It just seems a bit ironic when some are trying to say I'm the one doing the hounding and I'm getting abused left right and centre.

Like I said this Tolmie kid is well able to stand up for himself and "newbies" like me aren't going to make him stop posting his information on our transfer negotiations.

You'd swear I just told burst into a creche and started screaming there's no such thing as Santa.

Come on now...

 

[BlueMark]

Tolmie's never answered a PM I've sent him so to be fair I think for the majority any PM sent to him will fall on deaf ears.

He does get swamped tbf but take your point.

HI mate, Probably another reason IF he has decided to take a break from here

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

Tolmie's never answered a PM I've sent him so to be fair I think for the majority any PM sent to him will fall on deaf ears.

He does get swamped tbf but take your point.

Yeah I understand that, but it makes it virtually impossible for anyone to raise doubts to him in a private manner, so hence it means a lot of dirty laundry on the board unfortunately.

Also the same problem of TH's legitimacy comes back every few weeks, so really I think we need an ITK page where people can see for themselves the links to posts that particular ITKs get right or wrong, as the Ducado's list doesn't seem to be working.

Or alternatively, more mods to police the threads.

 

[Neville Kneville]

You cant ban someone for asking questions surely?! I know sometimes it can come accross as an attack but I bet there is plenty of people on here who want to know the answers to the questions some of these so called "ITK hounders" pose.

I have just gone back and had a look at the original post and it seems that Dzeko is our main target over Balotelli is this still the case? has Tolmie even mentioned Balotelli on here in any of his posts?

Perhaps if the thread was full of stuff about football & not people drawing us into arguments by hounding those who put out the info, you'd find it easier to look through & get the answers to your questions?

Apparently, as widely reported, there's interest in Balotelli, Kolarov, Dzeko & an outsider in Maicon. No recent updates or promises of times etc.

 

[oakiecokie]

I asked questions, I never abused the lad.

And you're damn right I started pecking my head in from the first post, because I wanted to know what was going on.

At the rate the lad has been posting youtube vids and giving info, I doubt he's going to hide because I asked a few questions.

Now you're telling me you should have banned me for questioning him.

Do you actually realise how ridiculous that is?

Stand on a stage and ask everyone to clap and nobody to criticise - is that how it works?

The lad is well capable of talking for himself as he has done.

Stop trying to blame RazorH because you haven't unlocked our latest transfer story.

Take that fucking chip off your shoulder, you'll find you'll be able to stand up straight. Now im sure your not on here to make friends etc, but you make it so hard for anyone to even want to get in any reasonable, sensible debate with you. Your the rudest poster I've come across on here, I can take the arguements and slagging matches, I've taken part in some, but your just a horriblle poster, who is quite frankly taking up valuable page space, imo, of coarse.
Dont reply you've been Foe'd.

I remember when I first came onto BM and thought I`d keep my head down and try not to upset anyone and post only opinion posts,without slagging anyone off.
However, I did make a right twat of myself by starting a thread ref changing the name of another thread from "Eastlands/Las Vegas" to Eastlands/ ??.
WOW !! What a mistake that was !!
It wasn`t done or meant with any intent other than IMO it made us look cheap.
I certainly didn`t expect so much controversy over it.
The general point I`m making is when entering as a new poster,familiarise yourself first with what goes on within the forum,get noticed as a poster and not a complete twat.
The old adage "once bitten, twice shy" certainly springs to mind for me.
However, I can now argue, no debate, in a more civilised manner,instead of treading on peoples toes too heavily.
Look, learn and listen first, without jumping in feet first.

 

[samharris]

whats top about that ??

razorH was on to cause a fuss nowt else...long term posters saw it and gave him grief..tit for tat..

This wasn't posted in support of razorH or any individual, it's just an observation that since I have been watching this forum that some "long term posters" don't take kindly to "newbies" posting comments of any kind, It isn't a very welcoming place.

Stop being so paranoid bud :).. Even the long term posters and iTK ers get grief too..

 

[YCNMIU]

By the same measure, why arent the ITK's censured when their ITKage does not come to pass ? And why arent ITKers bound to give any back-up to their claims ?

To be completely fair to TH, I don't really have a problem with his claims, only the fact that they are so bloody general & abstract, a case of talking often but not really saying anything.

The real 'look at me' ITK poster is Ajay, IMO, but I think that his claims are generally being treated with the scepticism that they merit (not saying that he is a complete bullsh**ter, but he has a tendency to exaggerate his ITKness).

The real thing is that people do have a right to question the ITKers, or to pull them up when things do not come to pass (take the last Monday or Tuesday claim) without being banned as long as they do it civilly, and without having clueless ITK protectors (who, lets face it, know no more on an ITK posts validity than the person who criticises it) claiming that they are a rag, or that they should stop posting or that they do not have the right to lick the shoes of the ITKer.

Sigh. Calv, there are other topics, young man. Try posting on them before you're banned for good.

So I don't have the right to reply, Giles ? And if you want, and are indeed capable, of banning me for good, then go ahead. I doubt that you actually are, but if you did it would show this board up for the dictatorial farce that it sometimes seems.