YCNMIU said:The ITK protectors are the biggest problem, I agree.
People have a right to post even the most ridiculous or unlikely transfer rumours.
People have a right to respond with their opinion on the validity of these rumours.
People DO NOT have a right to tell people what they should think.
FACT.
-- Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:14 pm --
de niro said:nothing whatsoever about being new, its about being polite, being civil etc.
however for anyone new or old read this.
<a class="postlink-local" href="http://www.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=178476" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=10&t=178476</a>
But Mr.De Niro, people get banned, even if they are civil, simply for expressing the opinion that the transfer rumour is bull**** or that in their opinion the ITKer is not ITK.
Which leaves people, such as myself, tending to think that the entire reason that the ITKers are protected in this way is to protect the site traffic.
Quote;
But Mr.De Niro, people get banned, even if they are civil, simply for expressing the opinion that the transfer rumour is bull**** or that in their opinion the ITKer is not ITK.
so why dont these so called doubters after they have said that the rumour is bullshit then go on to explain why its bullshit ??
having an opinion that "you think" its bullshit with nothing to back up your opinion is what gets up peoples noses..
It starts slanging matches...nowt else..the ITK's do have good info that they cannot prove because of their position but they do have good previous track records so their info should be taken in good faith that its more than not true..