BluessinceHydeRoad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 2,562
NipHolmes said:BluessinceHydeRoad said:There is absolutely no need to apologise to anyone or to don the sackcloth and ashes. Roberto Mancini brought the FA cup and PL title to this club. There is now only Arsene Wenger left in the PL who has actually done this at their club. Most of the "outers" wanted simply that - Mancini out. Those who had the vaguest idea of a replacement went in the large part for Mourinho in the belief that eye gouging was the kind of motivational skills our manager needed. Klop, who refuses to leave Dortmund for anyone, was the second favourite. There was simply no "Pellegrini in" group until he emerged as the clear choice of the board. Now, the "in" and "out" question is no longer an issue since Pellegrini is "in", and I've been impressed with his work and pronouncements so far. I stress that my loyalty is to City and no particular individual, but it is very, far too, early to judge. And in the euphoria at the quality of our play at times in some of our pre season matches we have to remember just how superb we were for by far the greater part of the '11-'12 season. I add also that we have had a good transfer window - and it may get even better - but that 3 of the players bought were targets before the managerial change. This window is, of course, very different from last summer, and that was not Mancini's "fault". Let us see how the season goes, when the real games begin.
Had Mancini got his way we would have drafted in two players who would now be approaching their 30th brithday and both on 200k+ pw. Navas would not be here and that is absolutely for sure, he is not a Mancini type of player.
Mancini's cheif scouts identified messrs Savic and Garcia, whilst both players played alongside Nastasic and Witsel. For that they want sacking alone. On both occasions they bought the wrong player and the 'right player' was playing beside them!
Mancini did a great job but Europe has been his downfall once and it's ended up being it twice. People talk about our first campaign with 10 points but 6 points were against a team that ended up being relegated and the other 3 points against a team already qualified when our future was guaranteed 3rd, Napoli was our arch-rival that campaign and we managed 1 point over two legs. Last season we had the worst group I have ever seen but the crime was against Ajax on both legs. 1 point vb the groups whipping boys is poor, a team built for the same as we paid for Scott Sinclair, an unused and unwanted player ffs.
Very selective again Nip. You know as well as I do who our targets were last summer but they went elsewhere, and none of them did so because Mancini was our manager. Garcia was a last minute signing and it's clear that whoever wanted some of our signings Mancini didn't appreciate them. Maicon was a Mancini man but the great criticism of Maicon is that he was injured soon after he arrived and never really played. Savic wasn't good but he was fourth choice and never played in Europe which is your real complaint about Mancini. Mancini also picked Nasti. Again in Europe you go on about Napoli, but that game actually shows how fine the margins can be - Ya Ya hit the bar and Sergio the post. Last year the group was as hard as any anyone has known, and we did perform badly in Amsterdam, and for the first half hour at home. But Ajax had won at OT the season before, and we had a good goal disallowed and what I believe a certain penalty turned down. That ref was incompetent or bent...but were weren't good enough to come out of that group, I accept. Klop had had a similar experience with an easier group the year before. And things went wrong for Pellegrini inEurope at Madrid.