ninjamonkey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 18,515
People want everything when everything isn’t possible. They want a world class trophy winning side but they want it full of teenage kids from the academy too. Doesn’t work like that. Of course that’s the ultimate aim but it maybe happens once in a lifetime for one club in the world, the odds of it happening here in the near future regardless of how good our academy set up is, is extremely remote.
We only really have two options, we carry on bringing in top quality players with the aim of genuinely competing for every trophy going and hope the kids can emerge without the helping hand as we are doing now or we can take the approach of somebody like a Dortmund or a Monaco of a few years back and buy in the best kids you can find, promise them first team football, throw them in at the deep end, sacrifice any real chance of silverware for a few years and in return we get quite small increased chance of developing and keeping that team of kids until they progress into a side capable of winning stuff.
Teams typically take the second option because they can’t afford the first and it makes them a lot of money. That’s not an issue here so why would we hinder ourselves in pursuit of the same ultimate result?
If the kids are good enough they’ll force themselves into the side, yes we will lose a few along the way who could have found a spot in our squad but that’s the price of success.
If there were teams across Europe bringing through kids regularly and winning trophies equally as regularly they’d be questions rightly asked but there isn’t because to get the two is a near miracle.
We only really have two options, we carry on bringing in top quality players with the aim of genuinely competing for every trophy going and hope the kids can emerge without the helping hand as we are doing now or we can take the approach of somebody like a Dortmund or a Monaco of a few years back and buy in the best kids you can find, promise them first team football, throw them in at the deep end, sacrifice any real chance of silverware for a few years and in return we get quite small increased chance of developing and keeping that team of kids until they progress into a side capable of winning stuff.
Teams typically take the second option because they can’t afford the first and it makes them a lot of money. That’s not an issue here so why would we hinder ourselves in pursuit of the same ultimate result?
If the kids are good enough they’ll force themselves into the side, yes we will lose a few along the way who could have found a spot in our squad but that’s the price of success.
If there were teams across Europe bringing through kids regularly and winning trophies equally as regularly they’d be questions rightly asked but there isn’t because to get the two is a near miracle.