Rascal
El Presidente
nahnahrickyholden said:
A worthwhile cause indeed my friend.
I just find it astonishing that on here there is more interest in an American execution than there is towards there own personal human rights.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Actfortheact - Save the human rights act now
- Thread starter nahnahrickyholden
- Start date
A worthwhile cause indeed my friend.
I just find it astonishing that on here there is more interest in an American execution than there is towards there own personal human rights.
nahnahrickyholden
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 293
I must admit, that had crossed my mind. This is all about raising awareness, and I think over the next few weeks this will become big news, and appear on the public agenda. I'm hoping discussion on forum's like this will help. The problem with things like this is that you only realise their importance once you have benefited from their very existence. Unfortunately we are very much in that camp.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
A hopelessly misconceived policy decision by this new government pandering to its lunatic right-wing fringe. I sincerely hope that there are sufficient centrist Tory MP's with enough backbone to vote this down, although I'm not holding my breath.
nahnahrickyholden
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 293
Campaign update: just passed £1000 in less than 24 hrs. Thank you everyone
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
If you demand perfection in this world you are bound to be disappointed.W12 said:So the Human Rights Act in its current form is perfect and should not be altered in any way.
It should not be altered, no.
What alterations would you propose?
gordondaviesmoustache said:If you demand perfection in this world you are bound to be disappointed.W12 said:So the Human Rights Act in its current form is perfect and should not be altered in any way.
It should not be altered, no.
What alterations would you propose?
How about the right to deport terrorists or foreign nationals that have committed terrible crimes.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
In what section of the HRA does it say you can't deport convicted terrorists?W12 said:gordondaviesmoustache said:If you demand perfection in this world you are bound to be disappointed.W12 said:So the Human Rights Act in its current form is perfect and should not be altered in any way.
It should not be altered, no.
What alterations would you propose?
How about the right to deport terrorists or foreign nationals that have committed terrible crimes.
Without them claiming a right to a family life.gordondaviesmoustache said:In what section of the HRA does it say you can't deport convicted terrorists?W12 said:gordondaviesmoustache said:If you demand perfection in this world you are bound to be disappointed.
It should not be altered, no.
What alterations would you propose?
How about the right to deport terrorists or foreign nationals that have committed terrible crimes.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I think you're confusing the HRA with the ECHR, mate.W12 said:Without them claiming a right to a family life.gordondaviesmoustache said:In what section of the HRA does it say you can't deport convicted terrorists?W12 said:How about the right to deport terrorists or foreign nationals that have committed terrible crimes.