Point to note. 120k isn't 12m but just over 6. 90k is just over 4 and half.waspish said:Danamy said:alera said:Exactly. So why not at least keep some respect and make him rot in the reserves ?
It might well come to that but as a Club it would be more beneficial to get them off the books.
It's catch 22, we either pay them the contracted wage in the reserves or cut our losses and let them go for no fee but save on wages?
It's the cost of being in a shit position to start with i'm afraid.
It is a catch 22! What you got look at ade's on 120k a week that's about 12m a year if you give him away your saving money and that goes for bridge 90k 8.5m a year Bellamy 90k 8.5m a year and so on it's bit the bullet time and get rid. In the long run it's for the best.
The Future's Blue said:Point to note. 120k isn't 12m but just over 6. 90k is just over 4 and half.waspish said:Danamy said:It might well come to that but as a Club it would be more beneficial to get them off the books.
It's catch 22, we either pay them the contracted wage in the reserves or cut our losses and let them go for no fee but save on wages?
It's the cost of being in a shit position to start with i'm afraid.
It is a catch 22! What you got look at ade's on 120k a week that's about 12m a year if you give him away your saving money and that goes for bridge 90k 8.5m a year Bellamy 90k 8.5m a year and so on it's bit the bullet time and get rid. In the long run it's for the best.
Just saying ;-)
He is such a cheap dodgy ****. I hope he ends up in prison.metalblue said:Rednapp was on radio earlier saying they only looking to take Ade on loan and we'd "have to pay a big part of his £100 odd k a week wages", sounded like he thought they were doing us a favour! Fuck Harry and fuck spurs, ship him out to someone else on those terms, might well be wrong but I thought if we show him as transfer listed we could exclude his wages as part of FFP anyways.
-- Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:22 pm --
He also said that GC had told him at HT today that there were one or two problems/issues with he loan deal (he aluded to wages).
Rammyblues said:For arguments sake if Ade is on 120K per week and Spurs pay half that is 3m per year for them and 3m a year saved for us. If we lose SWP who is also on 60K per week that means we have saved 6m per year. If Weiss is sold we get another 3m plus no doubt he may be on 20K per week so thats another 1m. Lose Bellars at 45K per week (again we pay half his wages) another 2m saved. Bridge likewise 2m and if RSC is on the same money and we do a similar deal another 2m. I am shit at maths but I make that 16m plus 2m for SWP making 18m off wages and income from outgoing transfers, that nearly in my book pays for Nasri or if not Nasri another player that Bert wants (needs). Ooops forgot about ned, we turned down 6m for him but lets suppose we now take the 6m and lose his wages of say 40K per week thats another 8 million plus the 18m equals 26m. They are never ever going to play for us so why keep them when that sort of money can be earned or saved.
bodak said:Rammyblues said:For arguments sake if Ade is on 120K per week and Spurs pay half that is 3m per year for them and 3m a year saved for us. If we lose SWP who is also on 60K per week that means we have saved 6m per year. If Weiss is sold we get another 3m plus no doubt he may be on 20K per week so thats another 1m. Lose Bellars at 45K per week (again we pay half his wages) another 2m saved. Bridge likewise 2m and if RSC is on the same money and we do a similar deal another 2m. I am shit at maths but I make that 16m plus 2m for SWP making 18m off wages and income from outgoing transfers, that nearly in my book pays for Nasri or if not Nasri another player that Bert wants (needs). Ooops forgot about ned, we turned down 6m for him but lets suppose we now take the 6m and lose his wages of say 40K per week thats another 8 million plus the 18m equals 26m. They are never ever going to play for us so why keep them when that sort of money can be earned or saved.
Great post.