Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 15,428
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
honestly he shouldnt get banned.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Aguero banned for three games (updated)
- Thread starter citytill1die84
- Start date
uwe rosler 28
Well-Known Member
It's time we got high profile ex players repeatedly ripping into the FA and the media, questioning every dodgy decision that goes against us. They can't punish them if they're not employed by the club
It doesn't make any difference to the decision they're referring to but puts the alleged bias into the spotlight and might just work in our favour in the future
Yeah agree and hope other teams take this stance all we want is a level playing field! Atm its well and truly lobsided!
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
Has to be seen to be a 'frivalous' appeal (unless the rules have changed?). There is no way they could say this would be one of them!!
Of course they would.
They are already saying he ref didn't see it, which is a complete lie & they all know it. Why would they suddenly change ?
it could easily be seen as frivolous as he clearly threw an elbow!Has to be seen to be a 'frivalous' appeal (unless the rules have changed?). There is no way they could say this would be one of them!!
Don Karleone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 21,559
- Team supported
- Vampire Squid FC
Been given an extra 24 hours to argue his case
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Yep he has,that looks like we will fight it properly thenBeen given an extra 24 hours to argue his case
Don Karleone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 21,559
- Team supported
- Vampire Squid FC
Yep he has,that looks like we will fight it properly then
Hopefully.
I think there is enough there to argue against the charge personally.
Might imply that he is 100% fit too which is good news. Don't think we'd risk a longer ban if he was injured.Yep he has,that looks like we will fight it properly then
Assemble video footage from different angles and you'll get disagreements. There are many people including Utd fans eg Mark Ogden who don't think it was a red card offence and we only need 1 of 3 of the panel to disagree.
Hopefully.
I think there is enough there to argue against the charge personally.
I suspect its only because the club would argue its a bit busy today and can we have a little longer. Don't think its anymore than that.
I don't think there is enough in it for a ban, but I wouldn't contest it, accept a ban if that happens and claim the moral high ground. Without him the pressure ratchets up a whole new level for them, imagine they can't beat us without our talisman, ha! It could play in our favour, plus we may also earn some credit with refs?
Don Karleone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 21,559
- Team supported
- Vampire Squid FC
I suspect its only because the club would argue its a bit busy today and can we have a little longer. Don't think its anymore than that.
I don't think there is enough in it for a ban, but I wouldn't contest it, accept a ban if that happens and claim the moral high ground. Without him the pressure ratchets up a whole new level for them, imagine they can't beat us without our talisman, ha! It could play in our favour, plus we may also earn some credit with refs?
Yeah you're probably right. In my opinion it's a yellow card offence,never a ban.
Still think we would win without him,it's more the inconsistency and that lying twat marriner that has pissed me off.
Be funny if it gets overturned though.