Aguero banned for three games (updated)

stony said:
According to the caf it's ok for refs to lie when you're rectifying a mistake you've made and it was only done to protect the ref.
Click to expand...
they are linking it just to the aguero incident which means their views will automatically try and justify it. Meanwhile the bigger picture and problem is the refs can pick and choose which incidents its in their best interests to look into. I find it worrying that they can say they didn't see an incident to get a player banned but more so they can say they did see an incident to get certain players off scot free.
 
stony said:
According to the caf it's ok for refs to lie when you're rectifying a mistake you've made and it was only done to protect the ref.
Click to expand...


That's because they are a deluded set of cnuts , who deny that they benefit so much from refereeing decisions.

Imbeciles, liars and hypocrites every one of them.
 
Chi-town blues said:
Kun's reaction says it all .
Click to expand...

To be honest, I think it does.

At first, I thought Kun was guilty and had simply tried to twat Reid and missed slightly. I was "OK" with him being banned because I thought fair enough, he deserves it. But looking at it from this angle puts a completely different complexion on it for me. It looks to me like Kun was about to jump for the ball, gets a hand in his face, and therefore ducks out of the way. His arm is raised partly because he was about to jump and partly to keep Reid away. It doesn't look like a deliberate elbow at all.

And even more compelling for me is that had Kun wanted to elbow Reid, he would have elbowed him!
 
dannyirishblue said:
they are linking it just to the aguero incident which means their views will automatically try and justify it. Meanwhile the bigger picture and problem is the refs can pick and choose which incidents its in their best interests to look into. I find it worrying that they can say they didn't see an incident to get a player banned but more so they can say they did see an incident to get certain players off scot free.
Click to expand...

The rules need changing, simple as.

Either the referees decision is final, or it's not. I don't mind either way. But we can't continue with this half-way house where the outcome can be manipulated however they choose.
 
Chippy_boy said:
The rules need changing, simple as.

Either the referees decision is final, or it's not. I don't mind either way. But we can't continue with this half-way house where the outcome can be manipulated however they choose.
Click to expand...

dannyirishblue said:
another thing that pisses me off is lamela getting away with eye gouging lovren and not a squeak in the media about it http://www.101greatgoals.com/news/t...pictured-eye-gouging-liverpools-dejan-lovren/
Click to expand...
This.
 
stony said:
According to the caf it's ok for refs to lie when you're rectifying a mistake you've made and it was only done to protect the ref.
Click to expand...
Protecting their self-interest.

FA needs to amend procedure now to restore credibility of disciplinary process. But this is not new. First Arsenal were on the receiving end. Now it's City. Outside of City, so one really cares if City get screwed.
 
Can somebody with a lot of Twitter followers post that Mike Riley video and state this is the person heading up the PGMOL.
Now would be a good time to raise the profile
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Me too, well near the halfway line. Maybe we shared an embrace when Sheron got the first?.....
Click to expand...
Oh those homoerotic Kippax days.

We should never have let them back into the game after a good start. I mean, I ask you, fucking Nayim!

I remember, to this day, one newspaper describing City fans as being "unable to contain their disappointment within civilised bounds".
 
Chippy_boy said:
To be honest, I think it does.

At first, I thought Kun was guilty and had simply tried to twat Reid and missed slightly. I was "OK" with him being banned because I thought fair enough, he deserves it. But looking at it from this angle puts a completely different complexion on it for me. It looks to me like Kun was about to jump for the ball, gets a hand in his face, and therefore ducks out of the way. His arm is raised partly because he was about to jump and partly to keep Reid away. It doesn't look like a deliberate elbow at all.

And even more compelling for me is that had Kun wanted to elbow Reid, he would have elbowed him!
Click to expand...
Fa chose to view their own perspective and just ignore the truth .
We have a whistle blower now and hope more comes out.
 
Pam said:
And then there's stuff like this ...

Click to expand...


nothing wrong with the bog brush he's not a dirty player it's just that his body language suggests he's being a dirty player 'the long arms' they have to swing somewhere and unfortunately it looks like foul play but it is not.
well this is what Darren Gougth said on talksite one day
 
marco said:
nothing wrong with the bog brush he's not a dirty player it's just that his body language suggests he's being a dirty player 'the long arms' they have to swing somewhere and unfortunately it looks like foul play but it is not.
well this is what Darren Gougth said on talksite one day
Click to expand...
Plus he plays in raggy red.
 
Newspaper pundit on Talksport this morning Tom somebody or other (that Georgie and Mickey Quinn were on) talking about the Aguero incident said no doubt it was a cast iron red and that Marriner is a very good ref - after missing what he considered to be a stonewall red - ycnmiu - this is what you are up against, complete and utter hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:
Pam said:
And then there's stuff like this ...

Click to expand...


Id love to know how many yellow/red cards and suspensions those challenges brought or how many media campaigns to get him banned where ran?
 
[MU]Prodigy said:
Legal action? Jesus Christ. He's intentionally used his elbow and for those denying he connected, Reid was very clearly in a lot of pain and unable to speak!

Don't get me wrong, the main issue is consistency. This should happen way more often, but in no way is it an agenda against City.

He elbowed a player, he's received a ban. Right decision, move on. Similar with Fellaini and Schweinsteger last season.

And FYI most United fans would rather have Aguero playing. No one wants weakened teams playing a derby, it's a lame excuse if you lose.
Click to expand...


1472509106159019220.gif




Changed gif for yeseye dont want Esther Rantzen on me...

tumblr_m2cj4vJDC41rp7jydo1_500.gif
 
Last edited:
so is there a chance that the corrupt FA or that "PGMOL" will be investigated by some organization?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top