Aguero banned for three games (updated)

Gundogan, Sane, Kompany and Bravo all set to come in. With or without Aguero, we're stronger than them.
 
We all knew it was coming, the only embarrassing thing is the referee claiming he didn't see the incident. 12 months ago I may have been slightly worried but Kelechi or even Raheem are more than ready to step into his position.
 
MCFCTrick said:
Video evidence seen by millions on BBC and Match of The Day proves it beyond any shadow of a doubt ..... that Mariner was close to and looking right at the 'incident', so it's there for all to see he is a lying bastard.
Click to expand...
And also not helped by Reid who went down holding his face like someone had shot him
 
As has been said, this provides Peg a bit of a tactical conundrum. Plus if we do get beat (bent ref) everyone will provide the Aguero excuse for us.

We've enough to win there and I was resigned to it anyway. What an opportunity for us to win without him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
How anyone can argue with this is beyond me, also entirely conceivable that Marriner missed it as he could have been watching the ball or any number of other reasons. Simple fact is Sergio swung his elbow and he shouldn't have done. We'll still beat the shite without him, as said above he was actually fairly poor (by his standards) on Sunday
 
MCFC1993 said:
We all knew it was coming, the only embarrassing thing is the referee claiming he didn't see the incident. 12 months ago I may have been slightly worried but Kelechi or even Raheem are more than ready to step into his position.
Click to expand...

Don't forget Sane or Nolito. We have options up top.
 
City Raider said:
As has been said, this provides Peg a bit of a tactical conundrum. Plus if we do get beat (bent ref) everyone will provide the Aguero excuse for us.

I think you are a little confused on this aspect.

If we get beaten, the whole fucking world will know that it was due to the sheer brilliance of the
" greatest team in the world. " .
Click to expand...
 
simon23 said:
its not just the inconsistency of the referring (though i totally agree with you)

its the inconsistency of the way the pundits in particular (and sky especially who have a huge impact on these things and lets not pretend they don't) interpret things

The example of the barnsley on silva one that you gave...quinn (who is a fucking disgrace and should never be allowed at city again and every fan should boo and jeer any time he sets foot in the place) said that it was a (and Im paraphrasing here) tough but fair tackle.......The guy (and others like him - Mcmannman, owen and various others) are facing disgraces and are openly effecting the outcome of Fa decisions with the clear bias...and as a knock on effect they affect potential results
Click to expand...

I used to love "Quinny" but he is a disgrace for someone inducted into our hall of fame. Bardsley is a rag who plays for Sunderland. Those teams can do NO wrong in his eyes.
The pundits are ex rags and dippers so there you have the agenda (Quinn no longer counts as ex blue imo, he´s a Mackem rag - we all know that he virtually had to spit out "stupendous" with bile that day)
Sky need fat, rag, part-time, glory-hunting arses on sofa´s buying their subscriptions.
The ref is clearly a pathological liar
Fellaini, Rughead and Vidic

Serge was silly though
 
I thought this was for "off the ball incidents which were missed by the referee". Neither apply in this case, this is a case of pacifying the witch hunt which occurred after the game.

Football is so bent that yet again the FA change the rules to suit their agenda.
 
FA have announced the ex refereeing panel. Selected by David Gill:


G.Poll
C.Foy
H.Webb
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top