super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 53,451
a bit different in Kane was a local lad and had a tie to the club. Isak couldnt give a fuckTo be fair Levy did it with Kane, then sold the following summer
a bit different in Kane was a local lad and had a tie to the club. Isak couldnt give a fuckTo be fair Levy did it with Kane, then sold the following summer
Always had the GPC down as an Oracle.Wasn't that the notorious "wouldn't sell them a virus" statement?
Then sold the virus in the very next window
We welcomed Tevez back at the end of 11/12 and it's a good job we did!! I don't even think he apologised haha
Haha, I don't think he did - not publicly anyway.
Instead he doubled down and took the piss by doing a golf swing at our away end after bagging a hat-trick.
What a man.
Straight back in against Norwich and him and Aguero had the Norwich fans standing up clapping every time they scored. He took the piss but I loved him
What is it that Newcastle have said or done to suggest they would be prepared to keep him in spite of Liverpool's efforts?Don't think this is a no way back situation for Isak, if Newcastle hold firm as they have to if they have any ambition, when the window shuts and he's still there, he'll have to stop whinging and get on with it and the majority of the Newcastle supporters may not like what hes done but they'll put it to one side if he starts winning them games again.
I still think the most likely scenario is he stays at Newcastle, signs a new contract with them and then perhaps he gets to leave the following summer.
What have they done to suggest they wouldn't?What is it that Newcastle have said or done to suggest they would be prepared to keep him in spite of Liverpool's efforts?
Tried to sign replacements, named a price for him, avoided saying anything resolute in public, excluded him from training with the team while he remains their player.. you know, the usual. All which clearly says, we are up for selling this guy if you want him.What have they done to suggest they wouldn't?
Tonali is arguably their best midfeilderwhy ?
Luiz + Vlahovic, who can be very good options with a change of scenery for Tonali
or
Nicolas Jackson for 70+mil
why ?
Luiz + Vlahovic, who can be very good options with a change of scenery for Tonali
or
Nicolas Jackson for 70+mil
If you want to keep the player, do you not instead just say he is not for sale. Aston Villa just did it for John McGinn.Newcastle can say he’s welcome to go but any clubs need to meet the clubs valuation which is £150m. So far no club has met that valuation.
If you want to keep the player, do you not instead just say he is not for sale. Aston Villa just did it for John McGinn.
Isak's value has just risen to £250m.Jackson for £70 million, stop the world I want to get off.
Isak's value has just risen to £250m.
And Hojlund's still worth fuck all.
Tried to sign replacements, named a price for him, avoided saying anything resolute in public, excluded him from training with the team while he remains their player.. you know, the usual. All which clearly says, we are up for selling this guy if you want him.
Well there are not many other options left. At this point they have to hope that they are lucky with their next target. Muani wants to join Juventus but they can’t afford him - especially with Vlahovic still being there.Newcastle linked with Wissa and Kolo Muani. That doesn't sound good. Wissa is a very good player but I don't think much of Kolo Muani. If that is true then Newcastle might as well give up. Isak is under contract for 3 years. What are you doing? It's not like Newcastle are some no hopers and this is Isak's last chance at a league title. He's in his mid-20s.
I didn't think Newcastle would be stupid enough to sell Isak but the transfer links suggest they are planning to sell him. Could be nonsense.