Your proof of this is...?

It's been reported across a lot of outlets. Lots of care homes have reported residents being asked to sign DNR form in their droves. Care homes across the country are reporting that are being dissuaded not to take residents to hospital and two managers in the article below are saying they've been flatly told they won't be admitted.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-52155359
 
I'm getting kind of bored of you rocking up each day and responding to posters with anything ranging from low level antagonism right through to full abuse. But you never present any counter point. The fact you've now wheeled out the virtue signalling line (and not even deployed it correctly) further confirms my suspicions you don't have any counter points.

Of course you are getting kind of bored me rocking up and disagreeing with you.

Kind of makes my point doesnt it?
 
Of course you are getting kind of bored me rocking up and disagreeing with you.

Kind of makes my point doesnt it?

I don't mind you disagreeing with me because you never offer anything that actually supports your view or any evidence that that the government you're blindly supporting is doing anything other than a terrible job. I don't see your replies and think "ah shit, he's got me there, better go away and revise my opinion on this". You just behave like a clueless troll most of the time.

You called somebody a fucking idiot yesterday without offering any argument. You called somebody a disgrace last week for simply sharing the account of someone working within the NHS who felt the nightingale hospitals (still empty) are in danger of becoming a white elephant.

You just turn up and antagonise whilst your central argument revolves around the baseless notion that it would have been even worse under a Corbyn government. In which case, we'd be levelling the same criticism at him. He isn't in charge so I'm going to criticise the people who are.
 
So what?

Are we really now suggesting that we dont bring up people you dont want to discuss?

This is why suggestions these threads are becoming an echo chamber are imo true and its why i have responded to Ric.

You slag the Government off because you wanted Labour in charge. No problems so posters will then discuss what might have happened had they been in charge right now.

My opinion is the exact same things and its a politics thread and its entirely relevant unless you just want an echo chamber?

I think you know the answer to your own question.
 
Its relevant because the posters you agree with tell us that things would have been all so different under him.

Thats right had Jeremy won the GE last December we wouldn't have shortages of PPE and sadly over 20,000 people wouldn't have dies from a virus that is spreading globally and the best scientists can barely keep up with, never mind politicians and their crystal balls.

By slagging the government off you are saying your side would be doing a much better job and that opinion will be discussed.

Unless of course these threads are just for slagging the Government and individual Tories off?
I’ve certainly not said that, so not sure who these posters that I apparently agree with (or indeed on what) are? Maybe a Corbyn government would've responded better to the crisis, maybe they wouldn't. It doesn't really matter though as it's merely speculation. No-one actually knows, which is why I think it has no real relevance to the discussion. Just seems like a fairly transparent deflection tactic to me. I'm more interested in what is actually happening right now rather than hypothetical scenarios.
 
I don't mind you disagreeing with me because you never offer anything that actually supports your view or any evidence that that the government you're blindly supporting is doing anything other than a terrible job. I don't see your replies and think "ah shit, he's got me there, better go away and revise my opinion on this". You just behave like a clueless troll most of the time.

You called somebody a fucking idiot yesterday without offering any argument. You called somebody a disgrace last week for simply sharing the account of someone working within the NHS who felt the nightingale hospitals (still empty) are in danger of becoming a white elephant.

You just turn up and antagonise whilst your central argument revolves around the baseless notion that it would have been even worse under a Corbyn government. In which case, we'd be levelling the same criticism at him. He isn't in charge so I'm going to criticise the people who are.

I find that quite hard to believe tbh and I'm not sure you've got the right person.

@blueinsa is actually a lifelong Labour activist :)
 
Corbyn is not in charge so what he and his cabinet would or wouldn’t have done is totally irrelevant. Johnson’s in charge , ultimately he’s responsible for the failures or successes of his and his Governments decisions.

Which Scientists, Governments and medical professionals the world over are currently telling us we will know 12/18 months down the line.

Until then we are very much in the stage of reacting to a virus that each and every day is seemingly changing, presenting new symptoms and needing new and different approach to beating.

Take masks for example. One person says we all need to wear one and another says no, wrong advice, only those with the virus should wear and healthy people doing so changes nothing other than taking PPE from those that need it.
 
I think you know the answer to your own question.

Most wont even own their own opinions anymore when challenged.

"If a Labour government was in charge we would be slagging them off as well"

Yeah fucking right.

Work to do so will leave this to those amongst us who have all the answers to all the problems and who can say "Tory cunts" with ease.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.