BucksBlue
Well-Known Member
Click baitWhy are 2 different reporters for the same paper reporting different things? Don't they speak to each other?
Click baitWhy are 2 different reporters for the same paper reporting different things? Don't they speak to each other?
Why are 2 different reporters for the same paper reporting different things? Don't they speak to each other?
Why are 2 different reporters for the same paper reporting different things? Don't they speak to each other?
Is Mullock reliable for City stuff?
That's what I was thinking. For me, it only gets interesting if an offer of £80m comes in and then, only if we have a replacement that the manager really fancies lined up.The figures dont add up for a swap deal, I think we all agree on that.
Out of interest, if we buy Sanchez (cash deal) and Arsenal then come back with a cash bid for Sterling, what amount (if any) would you sell him for?
Doesn't he make you fucking throw up.
What a shite excuse for a journalist.
How is giving away one of our most promising players, who we have been improving for the last two years building for the future? It's the direct opposite.
Mirror and Sunday Mirror are separate.Mullock is a pretty senior correspondent with serious links to the club. Barely ever tweets anything club related. I only trust him and Martin Blackburn as far as club sources are concerned. Robson, Ducker, John Cross and the rest are bullshit peddlers who get more wrong than right.