aguerrrroooooooooooo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Feb 2016
- Messages
- 11,040
Would you mind getting Johnny Evans tattooed as well please?He had better come!! Ive just had his name tattoo'd on my arm next to Isco and Kaka's.
Would you mind getting Johnny Evans tattooed as well please?He had better come!! Ive just had his name tattoo'd on my arm next to Isco and Kaka's.
Personally, I would give anything to have Angus play there.If none of the 5 players we have who have played centrally fancy the job, Bravo can play there.
Very confident there pal, You know something ?Sanchez will be a city player. All the shit banded about united have signed him is bullshit
So ....
What's the latest?
Am I the only one who wish this Sanchez saga would just be over, no matter the outcome?
Wrong again.
Pep places less emphasis on pass completion from his forwards, as they have regularly stated.
He empowers them to take risks in the final third, regardless of outcome.
The whole premise of Guardiola's set-up is to get us to that attacking point by controlling the first two phases upfield.
That way, our forwards losing the ball upfield means we can also win it back high and minimise the counter.
I'm sure Pep gets frustrated by Sane, Sterling and Sergio gifting up cheap possession with sloppy passing, but the rewards outweigh the risks.
Several ESPN pundits are now talking about why a move to United would not be beneficial to the club (stunting young player growth, upsetting the wage structure, unbalancing the side, etc)...
Walking things back?
No , I'm with you.
Could we be getting to use this beauty again? I damn hope so :DSeveral ESPN pundits are now talking about why a move to United would not be beneficial to the club (stunting young player growth, upsetting the wage structure, unbalancing the side, etc)...
Walking things back?
Is he better than sanchez?Icardi?
United’s mouthpiece (ESPN) desperately tries to reframe the Sanchez transfer narrative:
Sanchez to United isn't all about money
Alexis Sanchez's reported move to Manchester United over Manchester City is not about chasing money. In case you missed it, United remain a big deal.
I think you underestimate how much they have become a marketing arm of United (and many other clubs)—it is especially apparent living here in the US these last few years.I think it's merely a transfer that would have very obvious up and downsides for both clubs and as such while no one in the press knows the outcome, they'll discuss hypoteticals.
Every Arsenal deal is a circus & we shouldn't have got involved in the first place imo.
We could have had other players already at the club since the summer rather than, again, having money tied up dealing with them.
No. That didn’t happen last season.
Can no one count?
Would you mind getting Johnny Evans tattooed as well please?
And City have decided to "shut up" and not get fleeced by greedy twats.
Well done to them.
Anybody who takes anything itk's say too seriously are setting themselves up for disappointment. I appreciate them sharing their knowledge but ultimately things change so quicklydannyboiblue has claimed he sometimes gets info via a friend in an earlier post on Sanchez. So take that as you will.