birchwoodgingerste
Well-Known Member
Summer deal then?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Alexis Sanchez
- Thread starter Decepticon
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Patientman63
Well-Known Member
In summer 2012, the rags paid 24 Mil for a 29 year old Robin van Pussy, and they went on to win the league the following season directly thru his contribution. Everyone said then it was a sound investment. I don't see this any different to that deal.
kun
Well-Known Member
You could also say that Chelsea got a younger Eden Hazard for just over £30m that summer, and they didn't win the league.In summer 2012, the rags paid 24 Mil for a 29 year old Robin van Pussy, and they went on to win the league the following season directly thru his contribution. Everyone said then it was a sound investment. I don't see this any different to that deal.
Which team was better off in the long run and which signing was better value?
In summer 2012, the rags paid 24 Mil for a 29 year old Robin van Pussy, and they went on to win the league the following season directly thru his contribution. Everyone said then it was a sound investment. I don't see this any different to that deal.
exactly, no difference whatsoever, you could argue we'd be getting an even better deal than that
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
I would like to think that if and when Sanchez stumps up at The Etihad he scores all the goals we are currently missing, or just takes a shot when others are looking for the killer pass!
That's the conundrum isn't it? I'd say they both succeeded.You could also say that Chelsea got a younger Eden Hazard for just over £30m that summer, and they didn't win the league.
Which team was better off in the long run and which signing was better value?
Young Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2011
- Messages
- 494
The Arsenal " money men" may have less influence if we stick rigidly to significantly below their valuation.This is my view too. But I'm hoping the money men win. And soon :)
Bummer :( I have him in my starting lineup for Sunday :)The Arsenal " money men" may have less influence if we stick rigidly to significantly below their valuation.
Patientman63
Well-Known Member
You could also say that Chelsea got a younger Eden Hazard for just over £30m that summer, and they didn't win the league.
Which team was better off in the long run and which signing was better value?
Fair point, but I'd say one purchase was for an immediate affect, and the other a long term investment. In my mind, Sanchez is an immediate solution.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.