Alexis Sanchez

Status
Not open for further replies.
You could also say that Chelsea got a younger Eden Hazard for just over £30m that summer, and they didn't win the league.

Which team was better off in the long run and which signing was better value?
We are fine long term. Sometimes you also need short term solutions.
 
He becomes leass of an asset, to both City & Arsenal, at the end of the season imo.

They can get money for him now, & save his wages but he is likely to be less influential if they keep him & maybe unpopular with team mates, he walks for free in the summer & they could instead maybe bring in a fresh player now to inspire the squad.

We get an extra player now, who could be very influential when we are in 4 competitions & it is actually possible to win all of them, wheras we could sign anybody else we wanted, in the summer, it needn't be Sanchez .

Makes sense to get it done now, for both clubs & the player.
Agree entirely.
 
RVP situaution was different as at the time we had four strikers and I believe he wanted to play every game.

You're quite right in terms of our own situation. I actually meant it reminded me of the rags signing RVP. It was probably only ever going to work in the short term - and indeed that's the way it worked out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.