Possibly, but Malcom's not been linked with Arsenal for long and the 'finally' suggests he's talking about something that's dragged on, especially since Hugh has been very vocal about Sanchez.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Alexis Sanchez
- Thread starter Decepticon
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
JimmyGrimble10
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 686
Malcom being done and dusted (guessing that's what Hugh means) is the biggest challenge City have to face in overcoming this Sanchez deal in my opinion.
Not saying you're wrong mate but it really doesn't sound like something he'd do.think he's just trolling people
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
How reliable is this guy?Possibly, but Malcom's not been linked with Arsenal for long and the 'finally' suggests he's talking about something that's dragged on, especially since Hugh has been very vocal about Sanchez.
KDBtojesus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Oct 2017
- Messages
- 374
He has a good track record but seems odd to say just that. Fingers crossed thoughNot saying you're wrong mate but it really doesn't sound like something he'd do.
J_MCFC21
Well-Known Member
He was just waiting for his food to cook. Dw its done, finally.
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
Another needy/attention seeking Twitter cvnt.
dronefromsector7G
Well-Known Member
Does he usually seek attention? He’s had loads of replies asking him what the fuck he meansNot saying you're wrong mate but it really doesn't sound like something he'd do.
Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 38,657
Every penny he gets that Arsenal doesn't is money well spent.
Agree but it could be complicated financially.
He is still going to want either a big signing on fee or huge wage. I'm not a fan of players coming in and getting paid more than others (equal talent or better) as it can cause unrest and lead to a spiralling wage bill. Not sure De Bruyne would be happy for example if Sanchez was being paid £100k a week more than him.
If it is a signing on fee and then wages plus agent fee and £35m it could cost over £100m over the 4 years by which time he will be in his 34th year. It seems a lot of money for someone of that age. There would be no sell on fee. United may have trumped us on Van Persie but he must have cost over £50m for one decent season.
I prefer our buy the young talent strategy, develop them and keep them or if we do sell we make a profit, something we have struggled with over the years. This signing seems to go against our current policy a little.
If it was PSG and not united after him, I don't think too many would be as concerned.
What we should not do is go back to the days of paying whatever anyone wants.
Uniteds approach is very scatter gun. They don't seem to mind having a ridiculously high wage bill (rumours De Gea wants £300k a week now! Absurd for a keeper). They just want to keep the brand alive and they will pay whatever they have to to do that. They haven't had a good transfer strategy for many years, well before Ferguson left. He let our progress cloud his judgement and for one last hurrah he basically ruined them.
Possibly, but Malcom's not been linked with Arsenal for long and the 'finally' suggests he's talking about something that's dragged on, especially since Hugh has been very vocal about Sanchez.
I do hope it is about Sanchez to ManCity at price that the club would be ready to pay
- Status
- Not open for further replies.