All Time Top 1100 Albums (Aerosmith - Big Ones) P265

Who is your favourite artist that doesn't consist of any members of The Smiths?

 
4 albums before had no covers on them. I think!
This album originally intended not to have any covers, act naturally was only included as the song written for Ringo 'If you've got trouble' recording was deemed unsatisfactory and dizzy miss lizzy was a last minute inclusion as it was already recorded for a US aimed release of covers, and replaced the song 'That means a lot' written for the film and then the song 'Wait' it's original replacement was not finished in time, but did appear on Rubber soul
 
It's a huge like from me - best write up we've had this far in 59 pages......... :-)
Yep, it’s because of the quality of the band and the music I reckon, and the strength of the reaction it provokes. I for one wouldn’t normally bother with the thread, but an act/album like this, I cannae resist.
 
As noted when I gave my score, I don't think that I've ever listened to a Beatles album all the way through. I've put that right this week and listened to most of them. A few observations:-

1. A fantastic body of music and as others have noted, incredible that one band could produce so many top-notch songs in a seven year period.
2. I don't think that I'd give any of their albums more than 8/10. Most of them, particularly A Hard Days' Night, Help, Rubber Soul, The White Album, and Abbey Road have a handful of brilliant songs, but there is a lot of filler on every album.
3. Whilst Lennon & McCartney get most of the praise, some of George Harrison's songs are among the best in The Beatles' catalogue - I'm thinking of "While My Guitar Gently Weeps", "Here Comes The Sun" and "Something" among others.
4. Don't get the hype for Sgt. Pepper - a couple of half decent tunes but not up with the aforementioned albums. Yes, I know it probably has to be taken in the context of the time it was released, but all the same, it lacks the better songs of the other albums.

I feel the same about a couple of artists who I really like - Tom Petty and Rush - I know some others will disagree, but neither artist has a single album that I would put above all the others (I put Tom Petty's Full Moon Fever in our recent Top20 vote, more to represent the artist than anything). But take their best 30-40 songs and you have a playlist that will rival any artist in history.

Now, of course, The Beatles did it all first, and whilst their music doesn't mean as much to me as my favourite artists, I don't think that many people could argue that most artists would kill to have written and recorded any of their top 30-40 songs at any point in their career ..... yet The Beatles did them all in seven years. Incredible.
 
As noted when I gave my score, I don't think that I've ever listened to a Beatles album all the way through. I've put that right this week and listened to most of them. A few observations:-

1. A fantastic body of music and as others have noted, incredible that one band could produce so many top-notch songs in a seven year period.
2. I don't think that I'd give any of their albums more than 8/10. Most of them, particularly A Hard Days' Night, Help, Rubber Soul, The White Album, and Abbey Road have a handful of brilliant songs, but there is a lot of filler on every album.
3. Whilst Lennon & McCartney get most of the praise, some of George Harrison's songs are among the best in The Beatles' catalogue - I'm thinking of "While My Guitar Gently Weeps", "Here Comes The Sun" and "Something" among others.
4. Don't get the hype for Sgt. Pepper - a couple of half decent tunes but not up with the aforementioned albums. Yes, I know it probably has to be taken in the context of the time it was released, but all the same, it lacks the better songs of the other albums.

I feel the same about a couple of artists who I really like - Tom Petty and Rush - I know some others will disagree, but neither artist has a single album that I would put above all the others (I put Tom Petty's Full Moon Fever in our recent Top20 vote, more to represent the artist than anything). But take their best 30-40 songs and you have a playlist that will rival any artist in history.

Now, of course, The Beatles did it all first, and whilst their music doesn't mean as much to me as my favourite artists, I don't think that many people could argue that most artists would kill to have written and recorded any of their top 30-40 songs at any point in their career ..... yet The Beatles did them all in seven years. Incredible.
That’s pretty much exactly the way I see it too. Especially concur on Harrison, Sgt Pepper and “filler”. I’m not sure how you’d whittle the Beatles down to 30-40. I mean I could, for me, but globally, everyone’s 30-40 would be very different if only because there are so many to choose from. It really is a remarkable output over a very limited period of time. Genius.

I’d put Moving Pictures at the top of the Rush tree personally. Couldn’t get into anything after Power Windows.
 
That’s pretty much exactly the way I see it too. Especially concur on Harrison, Sgt Pepper and “filler”. I’m not sure how you’d whittle the Beatles down to 30-40. I mean I could, for me, but globally, everyone’s 30-40 would be very different if only because there are so many to choose from. It really is a remarkable output over a very limited period of time. Genius.

I’d put Moving Pictures at the top of the Rush tree personally. Couldn’t get into anything after Power Windows.
Rush? Now you’re talking. It’s changed over time, but these days I’d put Power Windows top, followed by p/g then Signals.
I wonder what @Blue2112 would rank as top? ;-)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.