SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
Re: Alonso and Ramos
How do you work out they should not be playing? In this scenario they have served their ban.
No rules have been broken and City would be able to use the same loophole should they need.
Chris Mac said:SWP's back said:He will now be suspended for the next match and back to zero cards.
I am not sure which but confuses you.
-- Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:29 pm --
Bollocks, what you say is all well and good IF YOU COULD APPEAL YELLOW CARDS, which you cannot. SO like Zabba picked up a yellow for a non-foul Vs Fulham and is now suspended for a game. The whole world could see it was not a foul, but according to your rules, tough shit. That is wank. It is makes me say, Jose played to the rules in book and tough shit on UEFA as they can't do anything about it. If they didn't want this situation to arise then they shouldn't have a stupid totting up rule of yellow cards that carry accross.
Let me get this right then.......just a for instance....City are playing Real Madrid in the Champions League knockout stage 1 and Ramos and Alonso both score and City lose the game 2-1 so exiting the competition to two goals by players who really shouldn't have been playing. How's your take on the rules then ?
How do you work out they should not be playing? In this scenario they have served their ban.
No rules have been broken and City would be able to use the same loophole should they need.