jimharri
Moderator
Tell me about it.There’s a few on here can show you how to fake it.
Actually; don't bother. I already know.
Tell me about it.There’s a few on here can show you how to fake it.
By the way; what the hell is a "Tik Tok lawyer"?
He reminds me of something you use to pick up on your shoe walking through the alleyways to Maine Rd, very unpleasant on a hot day.Surprise surprise; no condemnation of the assault by the thugs. I see he's also under investigation re alleged false claims of racism against another person. All I'll say is that the threshold for becoming a lawyer is fairly low these days. Actually, I fancy a career change. I might give it a shot.
Like a politician then?Basically talking shite and your followers believing it.
No you cannot say with any certainty that he did know he had been taseredAnd with all respect to you I'm not talking about whether or not I think he "deserved" a kicking. Everyone's entitled their view on that (although the only one that will impact the outcome for the officer is the law).
The original poster I was talking to has said with a great deal of certainty that the officer didn't know the guy had been tasered and inferred that the fact he didn't know that impacted the officer's judgement of the situation.
If you want to say he kicked him in the head cos he deserved it then fine, but that's a different thing from saying he kicked him in the head cos he didn't know he'd been tasered and didn't know if he was under control as a result. I think he probably did know he'd been tasered so of all the possible reasons why the officer may have taken that action, i think we can maybe rule that one out
Or that warm sensation you'd get on the back of your leg when the Kippax was rammed, and it was too much of a battle to get to those lovely toilets out the back.He reminds me of something you use to pick up on your shoe walking through the alleyways to Maine Rd, very unpleasant on a hot day.
Yeah I agree with this. The ways it's worded is kind of vague and i think they would have been clear about it if it was the result of the officer's actions. Just smacks of the lawyer being needlessly inflammatory and hysterical in his language. They need to bin that guy off, he seems a real chancer and hell bent on stoking tensions even further.
Posters claiming officer can claim concussion as a mitigating factor for his reaction.
Could the guy at the machine who’s been slammed into the machine first claim the same concussion? Or is that just afforded to the side these posters are on?
He's playing to his audience. I'd imagine that any decent lawyer must be astonished at his antics.After “ it was an assassination attempt “ and “ the older brother fears going into work as a cop as he fears he will be killed “ I think it’s clear this rat likes being hysterical