Altercation at Terminal 2

[Mon Autre]

You're likely to have been born with a cyst on the brain. I can't see the relevance of its existence with this act

Yeah I agree with this. The ways it's worded is kind of vague and i think they would have been clear about it if it was the result of the officer's actions. Just smacks of the lawyer being needlessly inflammatory and hysterical in his language. They need to bin that guy off, he seems a real chancer and hell bent on stoking tensions even further.

 

[Mon Autre]

Not sure he was thinking I’m sure this guys been tasered after just been punched in the head half a dozen times, more has this **** got my sidearm, good on him for not waiting to find out but make sure he was out of the fight.

All I'm saying is it seems a bit weird to be saying with certainty over and over again that there's no way the officer knows the guy has been tasered. He knows how they work. I'd have thought you'd have a good idea if the person holding onto you is being tasered.

 

[willipp]

if this was America we’d be posting in the todays shooting in America thread. The guy is lucky he only has a sore head.

 

[arbabarshad]

Posters claiming officer can claim concussion as a mitigating factor for his reaction.

Could the guy at the machine who’s been slammed into the machine first claim the same concussion? Or is that just afforded to the side these posters are on?

 

[BerkshireBlue]

Posters claiming officer can claim concussion as a mitigating factor for his reaction.

Could the guy at the machine who’s been slammed into the machine first claim the same concussion? Or is that just afforded to the side these posters are on?

What a weird response. Remember this lad in blue has already battered a member of the public in starbucks

 

[argyle]

Posters claiming officer can claim concussion as a mitigating factor for his reaction.

Could the guy at the machine who’s been slammed into the machine first claim the same concussion? Or is that just afforded to the side these posters are on?

Possibly, yes. I doubt it but he may say that.

If charged, as expected, would be up to the magistrate or jury to decide.

 

[i kne albert davy]

All I'm saying is it seems a bit weird to be saying with certainty over and over again that there's no way the officer knows the guy has been tasered. He knows how they work. I'd have thought you'd have a good idea if the person holding onto you is being tasered.

Like you I’ve no idea whether he did or didn’t ,what i do know was he’d been punched in the head half a dozen times seconds before was outnumbered 2to1 and had a firearm on him. He made sure the odds were even before tackling the other scummy ****. Suppose he’d lost his sidearm in my opinion he did the right thing no other member of the public was injured or worse yet some are vilifying him personally i reckon he should receive a bravery award.

 

[lazerblue]

 

[jimharri]

Any comment yet from that lawyer/solicitor/whatever on the second video? He didn't seem too reticent on making a statement after the original video.

 

[Bluesince1979]

All I'm saying is it seems a bit weird to be saying with certainty over and over again that there's no way the officer knows the guy has been tasered. He knows how they work. I'd have thought you'd have a good idea if the person holding onto you is being tasered.

Do u know what, with all respect to you, i have zero respect for those fuckers and if he copped for a couple of kicks to th head then …. Oh well