mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
So an assumption. Okhave you ever broke you nose? you can't see a thing for ages with tears streaming
So an assumption. Okhave you ever broke you nose? you can't see a thing for ages with tears streaming
based on medical facts and scienceSo an assumption. Ok
based on medical facts and science
Are you a doctor?
Here's what you said to me beforehand with your ad hominem attack "...but that would require judgement & respect for the law & I reckon you lack both as well."
That's why I responded to you in kind. You played your part. I don't do insults unless in response.
And again, you skew my point for your suited agenda, which doesn't come close to touching what I said. I didn't say the cop was "corrupt". That's your language.
I said he reacted, which nobody hasn't given clear it was not a reaction. I have laid out my reasoning with clear examples.
You and others have not.
So basically, you are trying to convey assumptions as fact to try and strengthen your position. Not the first time too.based on medical facts and science
Still no excuse what that cop did though, way too excessive force. Wouldn't have had a problem if he'd put a few digs in but kicking him hard in the head, no waywhy does there have to be an inquiry, fuckers launch a brutal sustained attack on police, fuckers get arrested, end of inquiry, go straight to jail
I think you’re probably right tbh.Personally I think this thread needs closing. Everyone going round in circles-trying to put themselves in the mind of the officer, which they can never do.