And so it begins...

pardoe said:
oakiecokie said:
But you continue to slag tolm off for doing exactly what you have been guilty of. Your words not mine "in good faith".So do you think for one moment that Tolm is a Wummer when he gets things wrong.
If YOU live by the sword then expect to get criticised when things go pear shaped.It may be more prudent in future to keep away from a Tolm thread bearing in mind ... people who live in glass houses ...

I genuinely can't see your point, assuming you even have one.

I posted a snippet of team news ahead of one game over two years ago which proved to be incorrect. I've never claimed nor professed to be anything I'm not. Other people live off their reputations as being eyes within the camp and have people chasing them around the boards like bairns playing kisschase in the playground. Anyone who doubts Sir Tolm is a bully or a spoilsport. As I say, I have nothing against the fella, I just can't recall one instance of him actually calling something worthwhile, despite his hundreds of posts in his own back-slapping threads each and every summer.

I will vouch for him. I know who he is and what he does and numerous times he has sent direct, non cryptic PMs before anything was in the papers that was spot on.

Also, one of the many examples of this was when he knew Hughes was sacked seemingly before Hughes himself, down to the day.

The only ITK that I have ever vouched for and will ever vouch for.
 
Damocles said:
pardoe said:
oakiecokie said:
But you continue to slag tolm off for doing exactly what you have been guilty of. Your words not mine "in good faith".So do you think for one moment that Tolm is a Wummer when he gets things wrong.
If YOU live by the sword then expect to get criticised when things go pear shaped.It may be more prudent in future to keep away from a Tolm thread bearing in mind ... people who live in glass houses ...

I genuinely can't see your point, assuming you even have one.

I posted a snippet of team news ahead of one game over two years ago which proved to be incorrect. I've never claimed nor professed to be anything I'm not. Other people live off their reputations as being eyes within the camp and have people chasing them around the boards like bairns playing kisschase in the playground. Anyone who doubts Sir Tolm is a bully or a spoilsport. As I say, I have nothing against the fella, I just can't recall one instance of him actually calling something worthwhile, despite his hundreds of posts in his own back-slapping threads each and every summer.

I will vouch for him. I know who he is and what he does and numerous times he has sent direct, non cryptic PMs before anything was in the papers that was spot on.

Also, one of the many examples of this was when he knew Hughes was sacked seemingly before Hughes himself, down to the day.

The only ITK that I have ever vouched for and will ever vouch for.

seem with me Damocles, tolm has mentioned loads in PM`S that has come true and hes mentioned a couple of weeks before its come well known. tolm, danamy,prestwichblue and MCRJON are the only people who definitely have contacts.
 
richards30 said:
Damocles said:
pardoe said:
I genuinely can't see your point, assuming you even have one.

I posted a snippet of team news ahead of one game over two years ago which proved to be incorrect. I've never claimed nor professed to be anything I'm not. Other people live off their reputations as being eyes within the camp and have people chasing them around the boards like bairns playing kisschase in the playground. Anyone who doubts Sir Tolm is a bully or a spoilsport. As I say, I have nothing against the fella, I just can't recall one instance of him actually calling something worthwhile, despite his hundreds of posts in his own back-slapping threads each and every summer.

I will vouch for him. I know who he is and what he does and numerous times he has sent direct, non cryptic PMs before anything was in the papers that was spot on.

Also, one of the many examples of this was when he knew Hughes was sacked seemingly before Hughes himself, down to the day.

The only ITK that I have ever vouched for and will ever vouch for.

seem with me Damocles, tolm has mentioned loads in PM`S that has come true and hes mentioned a couple of weeks before its come well known. tolm, danamy,prestwichblue and MCRJON are the only people who definitely have contacts.
I'll have you know they're not the only ones.

I actually know the door salesmans, aunties wife, 3rd cousin, twice removed, stepsons friend, binmans, paperboys dog.

So there...
 
richards30 said:
Damocles said:
pardoe said:
I genuinely can't see your point, assuming you even have one.

I posted a snippet of team news ahead of one game over two years ago which proved to be incorrect. I've never claimed nor professed to be anything I'm not. Other people live off their reputations as being eyes within the camp and have people chasing them around the boards like bairns playing kisschase in the playground. Anyone who doubts Sir Tolm is a bully or a spoilsport. As I say, I have nothing against the fella, I just can't recall one instance of him actually calling something worthwhile, despite his hundreds of posts in his own back-slapping threads each and every summer.

I will vouch for him. I know who he is and what he does and numerous times he has sent direct, non cryptic PMs before anything was in the papers that was spot on.

Also, one of the many examples of this was when he knew Hughes was sacked seemingly before Hughes himself, down to the day.

The only ITK that I have ever vouched for and will ever vouch for.

seem with me Damocles, tolm has mentioned loads in PM`S that has come true and hes mentioned a couple of weeks before its come well known. tolm, danamy,prestwichblue and MCRJON are the only people who definitely have contacts.
Out of a membership of 000's that's a big call mate.
Can think of at least 3 more who have shared good info.
 
Any chance of talking about transfer rumours? Far more fun than listening to a few blokes on a crusade that the rest of us are not interested in.
Why on earth some people are so determined to try and criticise people for posting bits of info that may not turn out to be right is beyond me.
Do these people not realise that most of us are not arsed whether the bits of info eventually do not turn out right?
 
Nightmare Walking said:
Any chance of talking about transfer rumours? Far more fun than listening to a few blokes on a crusade that the rest of us are not interested in.
Why on earth some people are so determined to try and criticise people for posting bits of info that may not turn out to be right is beyond me.
Do these people not realise that most of us are not arsed whether the bits of info eventually do not turn out right?

My new favourite poster! Bang on the money
 
Nightmare Walking said:
Any chance of talking about transfer rumours? Far more fun than listening to a few blokes on a crusade that the rest of us are not interested in.
Why on earth some people are so determined to try and criticise people for posting bits of info that may not turn out to be right is beyond me.
Do these people not realise that most of us are not arsed whether the bits of info eventually do not turn out right?
Yep. Some people need a reality check, step away from the keyboard and relax. Maybe even rediscover their sense of humour.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.