Another new Brexit thread

[AlexWilliamsGloves]

Would love a new Spittin Image show!

 

[kevin horlocks wand]

Would love a new Spittin Image show!

There is far too much material it would have to be on everyday or a couple of hours.

 

[Neville Kneville]

Not to worry - you are not alone in the manner in which you squirm because you cannot simply say that you were wrong - it is a common trait.

Do not know why? It is not as if you are going to get shot for being wrong.

You were clearly babbling and plainly wrong - you then seek to suggest that you meant something else - which is just silly as your posts demonstrate.

TBF - if your normal tone of posting was not so gratuitously bombastic and insulting - I would not feel the need to point out when you are being bombastic and plainly wrong. As it is you attack everyone all the time and therefore should not be surprised when people point out when you are clearly bullshitting

Anyway - let's move on

No let's not.

I posted that the EU, would get rid of the backstop, immediately, if there was an agreement made re the Irish border & I said it could happen immediately, as it is only there, as a backstop.

I also said that the backstop will not get through Parliament.

You replied to it, for god knows what reason, going on about the 'unfettered backstop' which I explained to you, would not exist, in the circumstances I had given. Then I explained it again, again, again & again & am still explainig it now.

I an not going to fucking 'move on' & allow you to tell lies about what I posted.

Do I have to find the original post & your reply to it, or are you going to stop being such an arsehole ?

 

[west didsblue]

No let's not.

I posted that the EU, would get rid of the backstop, immediately, if there was an agreement made re the Irish border & I said it could happen immediately, as it is only there, as a backstop.

I also said that the backstop will not get through Parliament.

You replied to it, for god knows what reason, going on about the 'unfettered backstop' which I explained to you, would not exist, in the circumstances I had given. Then I explained it again, again, again & again & am still explainig it now.

I an not going to fucking 'move on' & allow you to tell lies about what I posted.

Do I have to find the original post & your reply to it, or are you going to stop being such an arsehole ?

I think you already know the answer to the question at the end.

 

[Neville Kneville]

I think you already know the answer to the question at the end.

I should have asked if he would prorogue it.

 

[kevin horlocks wand]

I should have asked if he would prorogue it.

That power is in the hands of ric. Unless Gina doesn’t like it ;)

 

[kevin horlocks wand]

MPs grilling gove on the implications of no deal and operation yellowhammer

I thought there was legislation preventing no deal. Isn’t this a waste of time ?

 

[Chris in London]

MPs grilling gove on the implications of no deal and operation yellowhammer

I thought there was legislation preventing no deal. Isn’t this a waste of time ?

The legislation doesn't and can't prevent a no deal exit because it is open to the EU to refuse the request for an extension that by law the Prime Minister is required to make.

 

[Ifwecouldjust.......]

MPs grilling gove on the implications of no deal and operation yellowhammer

I thought there was legislation preventing no deal. Isn’t this a waste of time ?

We cant control 'no deal' if the Eu members don't grant an extension .... unless we revoke A50 ... that's why the debate is taking place..... if 'No deal' happens then everything thats been 'agreed' is off the table .... rights for Brits abroad / Rights for Eu citizens in the UK / No Visas / Flight and landing permissions ... everything


And we still need a border in Ireland

 

[Vic]

Do you ever post a point on the topic other than spoiling for a fight and insulting posters

He learnt from a master.

Not to worry - you are not alone in the manner in which you squirm because you cannot simply say that you were wrong - it is a common trait.

Do not know why? It is not as if you are going to get shot for being wrong.

You were clearly babbling and plainly wrong - you then seek to suggest that you meant something else - which is just silly as your posts demonstrate.

TBF - if your normal tone of posting was not so gratuitously bombastic and insulting - I would not feel the need to point out when you are being bombastic and plainly wrong. As it is you attack everyone all the time and therefore should not be surprised when people point out when you are clearly bullshitting

Anyway - let's move on

 

[kevin horlocks wand]

The legislation doesn't and can't prevent a no deal exit because it is open to the EU to refuse the request for an extension that by law the Prime Minister is required to make.

Even Boris cannot be so stupid as to take us out without a deal.

 

[FlemishDuck]

I thought there was legislation preventing no deal. Isn’t this a waste of time ?

I thought i heard Gove say he was in Scotland yesterday to help some Scots make prepperations for brexit and a potential no deal scenario?

Multiple times he seems to say that the goverment is making prepperation for the possibillety of no deal.

 

[kevin horlocks wand]

We cant control 'no deal' if the Eu members don't grant an extension .... unless we revoke A50 ... that's why the debate is taking place..... if 'No deal' happens then everything thats been 'agreed' is off the table .... rights for Brits abroad / Rights for Eu citizens in the UK / No Visas / Flight and landing permissions ... everything


And we still need a border in Ireland

See above he is a tool but he can’t be that much of a tool.

 

[Chris in London]

Even Boris cannot be so stupid as to take us out without a deal.

Some of his public pronouncements might lead a reasonable observer to believe that he is in fact that stupid

 

[aguero93:20]

He's going to resign?

I'm disappointed, I was looking forward to him dying in a ditch.

 

[Vic]

We cant control 'no deal' if the Eu members don't grant an extension .... unless we revoke A50 ... that's why the debate is taking place..... if 'No deal' happens then everything thats been 'agreed' is off the table .... rights for Brits abroad / Rights for Eu citizens in the UK / No Visas / Flight and landing permissions ... everything


And we still need a border in Ireland

The flight arrangements have been separately agreed. At least till next year. But UK airlines will no longer be able to operate in the EU, only between the UK and the EU. (So airlines like easyjet have transferred planes and staff to EU countries.)

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/air-services-from-the-eu-to-the-uk-in-the-event-of-no-deal

 

[Ifwecouldjust.......]

The flight arrangements have been separately agreed. At least till next year. But UK airlines will no longer be able to operate in the EU, only between the UK and the EU. (So airlines like easyjet have transferred planes and staff to EU countries.)

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/air-services-from-the-eu-to-the-uk-in-the-event-of-no-deal

Are you sure ? ... we've already said that Eu citizens rights are secure ... but apparently this is incorrect if we walk out with no deal ... surely landing rights / use of air traffic control would be similar

 

[BlueAnorak]

The Govt can only minimise the risk it controls. It cannot minimise risk it does not control.

May be so; however, all the risks mentioned in Yellowhammer report are controllable - though they may cost a considerable amount of money. MUCH LESS than the £8bn net that we pay to the EU per anum at the moment.
Business risk can also be controlled by companies following government Brexit advice. For example any company that imports/exports components or goods from the EU should avoid truck transport across the channel. To do this they should have obtained an EORI number and switched to container transit using a Shipping Agent and/or Customs Agent (many Shipping agents provide Customs Agency services) as goods pass customs here and in the EU in an average of around 30 seconds. It gets round so many of the problems of cross channel freight. Yes it requires more stock in transit, but delays will be minimised, the problems with driving licences eliminated and it will be better for the environment to boot.

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

It seems like a few pages since Jo Swainsons tits have recieved any serious consideration. Symptomatic of the plummeting level of debate in this thread.

 

[aguero93:20]

It seems like a few pages since Jo Swainsons tits have recieved any serious consideration. Symptomatic of the plummeting level of debate in this thread.

Says the protocol ignoring **** that's mentioned them several times without ever posting a picture.