gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
What if they're a ten year old child?Johnsonontheleft said:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Another shooting in america
- Thread starter Matty
- Start date
Johnsonontheleft said:If someone deliberately breaks into someone else's home with the intention to steal or harm they forfeit their right to life IMO.
Summary execution for petty theft?
Harsher than sharia law.
Johnsonontheleft
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 2,848
gordondaviesmoustache said:What if they're a ten year old child?Johnsonontheleft said:If someone deliberately breaks into someone else's home with the intention to steal or harm they forfeit their right to life IMO.
Then no. However, that's not much younger than the Bulger killers and I have a toddler who is the same age as Jamie Bulger was
Johnsonontheleft said:If someone deliberately breaks into someone else's home with the intention to steal or harm they forfeit their right to life IMO.
Simple.
Johnsonontheleft
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 2,848
sinnerman said:Johnsonontheleft said:If someone deliberately breaks into someone else's home with the intention to steal or harm they forfeit their right to life IMO.
Summary execution for petty theft?
Harsher than sharia law.
I wouldn't have people executed for petty theft. However I believe people should have the right to use lethal force to protect their family from an intruder. It's all about the risk of harm to the family.
Most parents would agree with me on this.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I think most parents would agree that you should have the right to use reasonable force.Johnsonontheleft said:sinnerman said:Johnsonontheleft said:If someone deliberately breaks into someone else's home with the intention to steal or harm they forfeit their right to life IMO.
Summary execution for petty theft?
Harsher than sharia law.
I wouldn't have people executed for petty theft. However I believe people should have the right to use lethal force to protect their family from an intruder. It's all about the risk of harm to the family.
Most parents would agree with me on this.
Which you already do.
BoyBlue_1985
Well-Known Member
How many ten year olds are burglars?gordondaviesmoustache said:What if they're a ten year old child?Johnsonontheleft said:If someone deliberately breaks into someone else's home with the intention to steal or harm they forfeit their right to life IMO.
BoyBlue_1985 said:How many ten year olds are buglers?gordondaviesmoustache said:What if they're a ten year old child?Johnsonontheleft said:If someone deliberately breaks into someone else's home with the intention to steal or harm they forfeit their right to life IMO.
It happens
[bigimg]http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1257/4726432672_c013b70c90.jpg[/bigimg]
BoyBlue_1985
Well-Known Member
Fuck you auto correct shit
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
My point is that whenever people assert that you should be able to use lethal force 'come what may' they don't actually mean that, because no two situations are the same.BoyBlue_1985 said:How many ten year olds are burglars?gordondaviesmoustache said:What if they're a ten year old child?Johnsonontheleft said:If someone deliberately breaks into someone else's home with the intention to steal or harm they forfeit their right to life IMO.
That is why the term 'reasonable force' is perfectly constructed. If it is reasonable to use lethal force in the circumstances you find yourself then that is lawful. And who decides if it's reasonable?
Jurors. Homeowners like you and me.
Why anyone would want to tinker with that is beyond me.