himalayan_blues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 856
With haaland its the debate like ronaldo.
Are united a better team with ronaldo?
I dont think so. But some might think otherwise.
I am in the camp that with harry kane city would have been a better team. With haaland, haaland is a better player. I am not sure about the team.
However If we were able to use haaland in the game against united than i think we would have given something else for united to think about. Silva and debruyne were man marked. Haaland was free roaming around but we didnt threw some direct balls to him. May be pep will have some more ideas of using haaland now. I think he is capable of playing the tiki taka way. He must be more involved thats the basic funda now.
Are united a better team with ronaldo?
I dont think so. But some might think otherwise.
I am in the camp that with harry kane city would have been a better team. With haaland, haaland is a better player. I am not sure about the team.
However If we were able to use haaland in the game against united than i think we would have given something else for united to think about. Silva and debruyne were man marked. Haaland was free roaming around but we didnt threw some direct balls to him. May be pep will have some more ideas of using haaland now. I think he is capable of playing the tiki taka way. He must be more involved thats the basic funda now.