gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Given that the drinking habits of some posters on this thread are such a source of irritation to others, I thought I'd use a....errr....drinking analogy to describe my feelings on this issue.
Comparing the price of a ticket in the eighties to today is like comparing the price of a keg pint of Trophy Bitter where the lines haven't beed cleaned for three months, with a beautifully kept pint of Timothy Taylor Landlord. Any one with the means would pay that extra to ensure the latter.
Sometimes, however, when a pub undergoes a refurb it loses something of itself and all the local characters who made that place such a colourful and interesting place to visit can no longer afford it, or feel like they don't belong anymore.
It would be very sad if our club became just another soulless, chain-boozer with better decor and products than previously, but with a much less redeeming set of customers to share the experience with.
There's no reason City can't improve the facilities, get a few new customers, but still retain all the old punters. None at all.
In my experience, pubs with a broad mix of customers, old and new, provide by far the most enjoyable night out.
It is in the club's strategic interests to differentiate itself from its competition. Keeping a watchful eye on ticket prices is a very cost effective way of delivering that. Any club employed corporate wanker with an iPad who can't see that is a shortsighted fool.
This clubs biggest marketing asset is its incredible narrative. Lose the rump of the people associated with that, and that narrative becomes palpably devalued. Is that really worth it for a few million quid a season?
Play the long game, City.
Comparing the price of a ticket in the eighties to today is like comparing the price of a keg pint of Trophy Bitter where the lines haven't beed cleaned for three months, with a beautifully kept pint of Timothy Taylor Landlord. Any one with the means would pay that extra to ensure the latter.
Sometimes, however, when a pub undergoes a refurb it loses something of itself and all the local characters who made that place such a colourful and interesting place to visit can no longer afford it, or feel like they don't belong anymore.
It would be very sad if our club became just another soulless, chain-boozer with better decor and products than previously, but with a much less redeeming set of customers to share the experience with.
There's no reason City can't improve the facilities, get a few new customers, but still retain all the old punters. None at all.
In my experience, pubs with a broad mix of customers, old and new, provide by far the most enjoyable night out.
It is in the club's strategic interests to differentiate itself from its competition. Keeping a watchful eye on ticket prices is a very cost effective way of delivering that. Any club employed corporate wanker with an iPad who can't see that is a shortsighted fool.
This clubs biggest marketing asset is its incredible narrative. Lose the rump of the people associated with that, and that narrative becomes palpably devalued. Is that really worth it for a few million quid a season?
Play the long game, City.