Are you religious?

i don't believe in god but i believe in GLEN QUAGMIRE,praise be to Glen,where's my tambourine????
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
For me, the accuracy of The Bible has absolutely no bearing on the likelihood of there being a god. It annoys me when atheists use the web of contradictions and absurdities that make up the majority of that book as some form of proof of there being no god.



.

The biggest shame is the accuracy of the bible itself as an historical document

If the apocryphal gospels (of which it is rumoured to be as many as 20) had been included they may have given people a clearer insight into what really happened. Unfortunatly the Catholic church at the time had to doctor the bible to suit its own ends, so it could survive as a religion.
 
BulgarianPride said:
glen quagmire said:
BulgarianPride said:
You can believe all you want, that doesn't mean they've existed...
:)


[bigimg]http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/age-dinosaur-bones-1.jpg[/bigimg]


[bigimg]http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b18/Crazyharp81602/triceratops-skeleton-6-6-07.jpg[/bigimg]



There's mine, now where is your's?


;0)

A bunch of lies, made up by scientists to control the weak. Next!
:)

oh the irony is killing me.
 
Skashion said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
For me, the accuracy of The Bible has absolutely no bearing on the likelihood of there being a god. It annoys me when atheists use the web of contradictions and absurdities that make up the majority of that book as some form of proof of there being no god.
and..?

and what, baby?
 
Nay Mr Wilks ....

i've never been religious , and i ain't about to start to be anytime soon!

It just isn't somethin' that i ever think about , and i had absolutely no interest in RE at school .
 
ban-mcfc said:
BulgarianPride said:
glen quagmire said:
[bigimg]http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/age-dinosaur-bones-1.jpg[/bigimg]


[bigimg]http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b18/Crazyharp81602/triceratops-skeleton-6-6-07.jpg[/bigimg]



There's mine, now where is your's?


;0)

A bunch of lies, made up by scientists to control the weak. Next!
:)

oh the irony is killing me.
Do you actually think i am being serious?
 
BulgarianPride said:
ban-mcfc said:
BulgarianPride said:
A bunch of lies, made up by scientists to control the weak. Next!
:)

oh the irony is killing me.
Do you actually think i am being serious?

i did, it's difficult to tell by just reading text on a screen.

i apologaise for thinking you were a mentalist.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Skashion said:
The Bible is a convoluted mess of self-contradicting shite, but a loving tolerant version is no more valid than a hateful one. It just depends how you cherry pick. Most people reject the more hateful strands and so most churches will naturally adapt to that because they want followers.

For me, the accuracy of The Bible has absolutely no bearing on the likelihood of there being a god. It annoys me when atheists use the web of contradictions and absurdities that make up the majority of that book as some form of proof of there being no god.

The Bible is a book that was written several thousand years ago to present the powers that be with a vehicle for control of the populace. On that basis it adds little or nothing to the debate as to whether there is a force that our tiny minds cannot comprehend.

Also, I have tried on a few occasions to read small sections of The Bible, as I wanted to buy in to the whole "it's actually a great book with some timeless stories" thing and I have to say that it is fucking boring. I usually tried this when I was staying in a hotel and there was a Gideon Bible in the draw. After five minutes of reading about how angry god was I was usually so bored out of my mind that I went down to the bar and got absolutely hammered. I'm not sure how that chain of events fits in to the idea that The Bible can save you from committing sin, but I'm sure that someone much more informed than me on the subject will explain that little dichotomy.

You commented on the Bible being a: "convoluted mess of self-contradicting shite" and the general thrust of my post was in agreement with that. I fail to see how my post was in any way a non sequitur. I was merely trying to use your point and expand upon it. I'm sorry if that was a bit left field for you.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.