Was that the team paid for in blood diamonds from Danny Fiszman, who gave Wenger a brand new team to win trophies?True but i respect him for the team he built at Arsenal, they really were a great side
Bloody Chelsea fans!Anfield the morning after
Couldn't give a shit, they were a great sideWas that the team paid for in blood diamonds from Danny Fiszman, who gave Wenger a brand new team to win trophies?
Did you say the same when Sergio scored a winner in injury time.Nobody seems to have crticised Rodri for removing his shirt and blatantly provoking the Arsenal fans. That booking may result in a suspension towards the end of the season when we need him most. I hope that Pep fines him. Otherwise, no complaints other than for the paucity of substitutions.
Lacazette had no intention of doing anyting other than stopping Jesus from following up any rebound. Did he get booked, did BT point it out - I suspect it is no to both questions.Would we get an extra penalty for that? ;-)
Just to go along with a lot of other posts, Ian Wright is a good bloke & i like listening to him as a pundit & his obvious love for this great game of ours.
To be fair, I watched the highlights too, and it doesn't really reflect how well they played. It was mainly their energy that stopped us stringing three passes together in the first half, and they looked far more dangerous with the ball. But yeah, in terms of final product, there wasn't much cutting edge. Having said that, there were probably at least two or three other clear opportunities other than the goal that they should have scored from, whereas for us, I can't really remember us creating much at all, other than a couple of headers that should have been on target. Obviously when we were a man up, we dominated the game, but we still were largely limited to pot shots and easily defended balls.Looked back at the highlights and Arsenal din't do as much as people have been going on about. They were better but the margin wasn't as its made out to be.