Arsenal Thread 2013/14

[SrilankanBlue]

has to to a point where I hate their twattish bellend fans as much as if not more than United fans, check the replies to the post about Aguero possibly being out for 6 weeks on @City_Watch,

 

[TCIB]

has to to a point where I hate their twattish bellend fans as much as if not more than United fans, check the replies to the post about Aguero possibly being out for 6 weeks on @City_Watch,

It is a good account that city watch, i shall assume bile and rhetoric being slung at us from angry gooners ?
Well forget assume i shall have a ganders.

 

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

He a very charming man off the pitch when away from football but in interviews he holds a lot back to be fair in terms of his personality. i think after last few years very wary of media.

so in plain terms he is a miserable boring old deluded fucker......................and a loser.

Arsenal fans listen to the biased media tripe too often.

Wenger is just protecting his players, after getting hammered 6-3 the last thing you want to hear is that you cant compete with this team. I would expect every top manager to say what he said.

Hilarious! Wenger saw a serious spanking on the horizon and decided, as always, he didn't want to take responsibility for it. He started making the 'we're tired' excuses before the game so as to put the blame elsewhere. You're team were therefore given the excuse to lose, and the fans don't blame Wenger for the loss (and are happy to see him get a contract-extension for £8 million). Spineless.

 

[gooner2]

Thank you spurs, stealing the negative headlines from us, itll all be about avb tomorrow. What a hammering.

Spurs are the gift that keep of giving. what a joke they are.

 

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

Its amazing how Manchester city fans seem to hate arsenal but the feeling isnt reciprocated by gooners. City fans are seen as more deserved of their success because they suffered for so long, and city as a club are seen as a lesser of all the other evils. I guess this will change when city fans stop feeling lucky and start feeling entitled, which is whats happening now.
I remember going into a pub outside the emirates after we beat stoke 3-1 earlier this season, reason I went in was the loud cheers I was hearing, I see city 3 united 0 on the big screen and everyone dancing about in their arsenal shirts.
Maybe "hating" arsenal is what other big clubs do so this is just manchester city fans assuming their position to create a rivalry that doesnt really exist.
The other thing I find significant on the forum in general, is how manchester city fans are always looking for reactions to their wins, theyve just stuck 6 past us playing swashbuckling football and its as if they want validation from the press, wenger, arsenal fans. They need to understand that they will never get that, and they should not be looking for that. Just enjoy being the best and know that it irks everyone else. When we didnt lose a game all season the press were still having a go at us for not winning the treble. Other managers and other fans will never laud your achievements, but they all would love to swap teams with you. I know I would.

There was a common purpose between Arsenal and City fans for a number of years, most discernibly from 1996 to 2008, for reasons which I don't need to expand upon, which made the bile which was directed towards us from many Arsenal fans, following the takeover, particularly hard to take. I would say that Arsenal fans took our change in fortune as badly as any set of supporters, even united's - possibly because at the time, buoyed by so many years of almost unbridled success, and all too aware of City's previous hard-wiring to self-destruct, their supporters were cocooned from any sense of threat to their clubs enduring hegemony.

What especially stuck in the craw was the widespread suggestion from many of your supporters that we did not deserve this because our club somehow lacked "history" and this served to annoy for two reasons:

Firstly, because it shows a complete lack of understanding and respect for what was (and is) a leading English footballing institution. It may not have won as many trophies as Arsenal in recent years, but City's narrative, the real history of any football club, is as interesting as any other cub in the land. Anyone who fails to appreciate the currency of this doesn't really 'get' what it is to be a football supporter.

Secondly, because it was espoused by Arsenal fans who were ignorant, or willfully blind, to their own club's dubious past: buying their way into the First Division at the expense of Spurs; the highly questionable business practices of Henry Norris; George Graham's bungs; the Danny Fizman cash injection (aka: investment) in the 1990's; the naked self-greed of the club's central role at the vanguard of forming the TV deals in the late 80's and early 90's at others club's expense; as well as their wholly selfish membership of the G-14, are all examples which many of your supporters conspicuously avoid reconciling when talking about "earning" the right to sit at the top table. Possibly because they aren't aware of them. People pontificating about "history" really should do a bit more research on their chosen subject.

That is why you see so much vitriol directed towards so many of your supporters from City fans both on here and more generally.

No-one likes a hypocrite, especially one that turns on you when you have a bit of good fortune in life.

It does seem, after all, that you can buy class. Perhaps you should take that banner down, just like united did once we'd rammed it down their throats. That would show a bit of "class" hitherto all too sadly lacking from many people connected with your club.

Oh ffs.. was gonna post that too...thats the last time I pm you my ideas!!! ;)

I always had you down as the brains in this outfit!

 

[JamesMCFC]

Its amazing how Manchester city fans seem to hate arsenal but the feeling isnt reciprocated by gooners. City fans are seen as more deserved of their success because they suffered for so long, and city as a club are seen as a lesser of all the other evils. I guess this will change when city fans stop feeling lucky and start feeling entitled, which is whats happening now.
I remember going into a pub outside the emirates after we beat stoke 3-1 earlier this season, reason I went in was the loud cheers I was hearing, I see city 3 united 0 on the big screen and everyone dancing about in their arsenal shirts.
Maybe "hating" arsenal is what other big clubs do so this is just manchester city fans assuming their position to create a rivalry that doesnt really exist.
The other thing I find significant on the forum in general, is how manchester city fans are always looking for reactions to their wins, theyve just stuck 6 past us playing swashbuckling football and its as if they want validation from the press, wenger, arsenal fans. They need to understand that they will never get that, and they should not be looking for that. Just enjoy being the best and know that it irks everyone else. When we didnt lose a game all season the press were still having a go at us for not winning the treble. Other managers and other fans will never laud your achievements, but they all would love to swap teams with you. I know I would.

There was a common purpose between Arsenal and City fans for a number of years, most discernibly from 1996 to 2008, for reasons which I don't need to expand upon, which made the bile which was directed towards us from many Arsenal fans, following the takeover, particularly hard to take. I would say that Arsenal fans took our change in fortune as badly as any set of supporters, even united's - possibly because at the time, buoyed by so many years of almost unbridled success, and all too aware of City's previous hard-wiring to self-destruct, their supporters were cocooned from any sense of threat to their clubs enduring hegemony.

What especially stuck in the craw was the widespread suggestion from many of your supporters that we did not deserve this because our club somehow lacked "history" and this served to annoy for two reasons:

Firstly, because it shows a complete lack of understanding and respect for what was (and is) a leading English footballing institution. It may not have won as many trophies as Arsenal in recent years, but City's narrative, the real history of any football club, is as interesting as any other cub in the land. Anyone who fails to appreciate the currency of this doesn't really 'get' what it is to be a football supporter.

Secondly, because it was espoused by Arsenal fans who were ignorant, or willfully blind, to their own club's dubious past: buying their way into the First Division at the expense of Spurs; the highly questionable business practices of Henry Norris; George Graham's bungs; the Danny Fizman cash injection (aka: investment) in the 1990's; the naked self-greed of the club's central role at the vanguard of forming the TV deals in the late 80's and early 90's at others club's expense; as well as their wholly selfish membership of the G-14, are all examples which many of your supporters conspicuously avoid reconciling when talking about "earning" the right to sit at the top table. Possibly because they aren't aware of them. People pontificating about "history" really should do a bit more research on their chosen subject.

That is why you see so much vitriol directed towards so many of your supporters from City fans both on here and more generally.

No-one likes a hypocrite, especially one that turns on you when you have a bit of good fortune in life.

It does seem, after all, that you can buy class. Perhaps you should take that banner down, just like united did once we'd rammed it down their throats. That would show a bit of "class" hitherto all too sadly lacking from many people connected with your club.

[bigimg]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-9QjARWd5a84/T3OXHJJbe1I/AAAAAAAAA34/OVtLNvwpMvI/s190/nod-of-approval.gif[/bigimg]

 

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

There was a common purpose between Arsenal and City fans for a number of years, most discernibly from 1996 to 2008, for reasons which I don't need to expand upon, which made the bile which was directed towards us from many Arsenal fans, following the takeover, particularly hard to take. I would say that Arsenal fans took our change in fortune as badly as any set of supporters, even united's - possibly because at the time, buoyed by so many years of almost unbridled success, and all too aware of City's previous hard-wiring to self-destruct, their supporters were cocooned from any sense of threat to their clubs enduring hegemony.

What especially stuck in the craw was the widespread suggestion from many of your supporters that we did not deserve this because our club somehow lacked "history" and this served to annoy for two reasons:

Firstly, because it shows a complete lack of understanding and respect for what was (and is) a leading English footballing institution. It may not have won as many trophies as Arsenal in recent years, but City's narrative, the real history of any football club, is as interesting as any other cub in the land. Anyone who fails to appreciate the currency of this doesn't really 'get' what it is to be a football supporter.

Secondly, because it was espoused by Arsenal fans who were ignorant, or willfully blind, to their own club's dubious past: buying their way into the First Division at the expense of Spurs; the highly questionable business practices of Henry Norris; George Graham's bungs; the Danny Fizman cash injection (aka: investment) in the 1990's; the naked self-greed of the club's central role at the vanguard of forming the TV deals in the late 80's and early 90's at others club's expense; as well as their wholly selfish membership of the G-14, are all examples which many of your supporters conspicuously avoid reconciling when talking about "earning" the right to sit at the top table. Possibly because they aren't aware of them. People pontificating about "history" really should do a bit more research on their chosen subject.

That is why you see so much vitriol directed towards so many of your supporters from City fans both on here and more generally.

No-one likes a hypocrite, especially one that turns on you when you have a bit of good fortune in life.

It does seem, after all, that you can buy class. Perhaps you should take that banner down, just like united did once we'd rammed it down their throats. That would show a bit of "class" hitherto all too sadly lacking from many people connected with your club.

GDM on fine form these last few days.

The vitriol was more to do with City trying to become arsenal, Adebayor nasri clichy toure platt vieira marwood . Had you raided someone elses club I dont think the reaction wouldve been the same. All that has passed now, city have given us nearly 100m on players who can longer get into our side or theirs with the exception of nasri. It was always going to be a temporary hatred, as for the history, Its a badge of honour for us that we paid to get spurs relegated, it has a created a 100 years of wonderful rivalry and made us what we are. I dont know any arsenal fan who thinks man city lacked history, in the way chelsea do. I think people use the money as a stick to beat man city with because it seems to really infuriate the city fans who seem to be ashamed of the money instead of embracing it like chelsea fans when they used to wear miillionaires shirts and wave £20 notes around.

Chelsea don't lack history. They lack success going back over the years, but then we won a trophy 30 years before you did.

 

[SrilankanBlue]

has to to a point where I hate their twattish bellend fans as much as if not more than United fans, check the replies to the post about Aguero possibly being out for 6 weeks on @City_Watch,

It is a good account that city watch, i shall assume bile and rhetoric being slung at us from angry gooners ?
Well forget assume i shall have a ganders.

@City_Watch
Daily Mail: Aguero could miss six weeks after damaging a leg muscle against Arsenal. (UNCONFIRMED)

That was the tweet mate and there was a disgusting outpouring of glee from arsenal fans exclusively, disgusting

"Thank U Jesus! "

" get in there woman!!!"

"FUCKING YES"

"*6 months inshallah"

"Lovely!"

 

[gooner2]

has to to a point where I hate their twattish bellend fans as much as if not more than United fans, check the replies to the post about Aguero possibly being out for 6 weeks on @City_Watch,

It is a good account that city watch, i shall assume bile and rhetoric being slung at us from angry gooners ?
Well forget assume i shall have a ganders.

@City_Watch
Daily Mail: Aguero could miss six weeks after damaging a leg muscle against Arsenal. (UNCONFIRMED)

That was the tweet mate and there was a disgusting outpouring of glee from arsenal fans exclusively, disgusting

"Thank U Jesus! "

" get in there woman!!!"

"FUCKING YES"

"*6 months inshallah"

"Lovely!"

Well disspointing to see that reaction, That never good to see to be fair.

 

[TCIB]

Bitter as fuck.