Salford_Blue
Well-Known Member
How have Chelsea managed to stay in contention?
Ronuja said:The thing is, we are too. Fourth richest in the world if you believe Forbes.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2013/04/17/soccers-most-valuable-teams-real-madrid-dethrones-manchester-united-from-top-spot-at-3-3-billion/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian ... 3-billion/</a>
6th according to Deloitte.
<a class="postlink" href="http://swissramble.blogspot.com/2013/08/arsenal-money-dont-matter-2-night.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://swissramble.blogspot.com/2013/08 ... night.html</a> (you have to scroll down a bit for the relevant table.)
I guess some of us tarquins are bitter that you've suddenly become rich - I find that childish, short-sighted, and ignorant.
"Dennis Bergkamp
Bergkamp left Internazionale and signed with Arsenal in June 1995 for a transfer fee estimated at £7.5m. He joined Bruce Rioch’s Arsenal as an established 26 year old international footballer who looked to have his best years ahead of him. Back then, £7.5m was a huge amount to pay,"
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.soccerissue.com/2012/12/10/how-much-would-the-invincibles-cost-today/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.soccerissue.com/2012/12/10/h ... ost-today/</a>
Anyone who's bitter about that is just very silly. A more justified bitterness, in my opinion, stems from our unwillingness to show the money in recent seasons, pre-Ozil. Perhaps though, that is now gradually changing, and if that turns out to be true, you'll find much less of us 'bitter' about your recent prosperity.
worsleyweb said:And the pigment in their red padded seats is starting to fade!!
It's all going wrong!.
Ronuja said:worsleyweb said:And the pigment in their red padded seats is starting to fade!!
It's all going wrong!.
If drawing to Chelsea and ending the day second place on goal difference is 'all going wrong', I really, really don't mind. Could not believe the booing at the end, I suppose it's mostly just spoiled kids who can afford to go to the Emirates these days.
Puppet Master Silva said:Ronuja said:worsleyweb said:And the pigment in their red padded seats is starting to fade!!
It's all going wrong!.
If drawing to Chelsea and ending the day second place on goal difference is 'all going wrong', I really, really don't mind. Could not believe the booing at the end, I suppose it's mostly just spoiled kids who can afford to go to the Emirates these days.
Well, yes. Considering you had a home game to go 7 points clear just 2 weeks ago...
Ronuja said:Puppet Master Silva said:Ronuja said:If drawing to Chelsea and ending the day second place on goal difference is 'all going wrong', I really, really don't mind. Could not believe the booing at the end, I suppose it's mostly just spoiled kids who can afford to go to the Emirates these days.
Well, yes. Considering you had a home game to go 7 points clear just 2 weeks ago...
True, that is a 5 point cushion at the top whittled away, but frankly sitting at the top of the table for so long made me downright nervous. I'm perfectly happy with where we are right now, especially if we can pick up with a win at West Ham. The ideal place, in my opinion, is not miles out in front with months still to go in the season (therefore giving yourself ample time to bottle it as we did in 2008), but rather bubbling away just below the top.
waspish said:That performance tells me that Wenger and his players don't believe they can win the league and that 6-3 thrashing has hurt them..
afc16 said:ManCitizens. said:afc16 said:no arsenal supporters i know think that you were some tiny club before your takeover.
but neither were you anywhere near big enough to bag one of the biggest (if not the biggest) sponsorship deal in the premier league and Europe were you? thats why there was so much suspicion around the sponsorship, once it turned out the sponsor was directly related to the city owner.
like i said in previous post, theres no way even any city fan can deny the obvious with that one...
Etihad is I no way shape or form directly related to our owner. It's like Alan Sugar buying Valencia, investing millions into the playing staff and infrastructure of the club and getting sponsored by a company like BT. Completely unrelated yet you fools can't understand that as all you see is an 'Arab'.
this shows a terrible lack of understanding of your own club.
if the scenario you described with alan sugar happened, it would be totally different as alan sugar has no links whatsoever with BT.
your deal with etihad on the other hand, from the BBC:
"Etihad Airways, for example, is owned by the Abu Dhabi government. The oil-rich state's ruler, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, is Sheikh Mansour's half-brother."
so basically the main man, the ruler of Abu Dhabi, who effectively owns the etihad company, is the man city owners half brother. hmmm
on top of that there was also investigations and allegations from uefa and other governing bodies around the deal. this shows it isn't just 'bitter arsenal fans' that thought the same thing.
obviously nothing got proved in the end as with a deal like this, done in a closed country such as abu dhabi, you are never going to be able to prove anything for definite.