Inter Me Nan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 10,490
We weren't that bad, if it weren't for Leno it would've easier!Miles too soon. Did u see us yesterday? So many twists to come
We weren't that bad, if it weren't for Leno it would've easier!Miles too soon. Did u see us yesterday? So many twists to come
The ramblings of an entitled fan who thinks that being top for a certain period of the season means that they should be champions.
Tired but got our goals scored, shut Fulham down and saw out the win fairly comfortably. Outside of their goal they didn't have any clear chances, at home and a goal down. That's impressive against a side having a great season. Could have had 3 or 4 but for Leno temporarily rediscovering his form of a decade ago. Performance of champions.Miles too soon. Did u see us yesterday? So many twists to come
It's radical, but I like itThat Arsenal fan is right. The way the league is decided is a farce. I've had a think about it and believe I've come up with a fairer way
1: Each team plays every other team home and away.
2: Points are awarded based on the result of the game. 3 points to the winning team. 1 point each in the event of a draw. 0 points to the losing team.
3: we keep a running total of all the points gained throughout the season.
4: the team that has gained the most number of points at the end of the season when every team has played every other team twice is crowned the league champions
Hope it catches on and we can finally get rid of the ridiculous system we have that currently means only City can win the league
I think league tables during the season should be based on maximum points possible. Cuts out the games in hand confusion.
But who gets them?I think league tables during the season should be based on maximum points possible. Cuts out the games in hand confusion.
But who gets them?
Who gets what?But who gets them?