Tim of the Oak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 18,772
I think we need some clarification on a fair few points to be honest. If indeed the CM reps agreed to things as detailed above, it needs to be made clear by the club. If the club have decided to do it differently then the City Matters people need to make it clear that this is not what they agreed to, for their own good as much as anyone else’s, because at the moment it’s they that are being hung out to dry and the club seem happy for them to take all the flak. Regarding the ID checks though, I do feel PB’s tweet the other day defending supporters clubs who buy tickets and pass them on was quite telling and unless I’m barking up the wrong tree, it seemed to be an admission that the supporters club allocation won’t be subject to ID checks.
Whatever people’s feelings are on all this, I agree that nobody should be getting personal threats though, and that sort of shit is typical of social media, Twitter in particular.
I haven’t seen PBS tweet so I can comment on the specifics. That approach might have backfired but it’s City who make the decisions.
Yes City Matters members do need to make clear what they agreed and I think the 18-25 rep did that. IMHO the City Matters Reps were on a hiding to nothing from the day the Season Card prices were increased for this season. This wasn’t a CM decision but they needed an “early win” to
Soften the flak they were likely to receive on other issues. Once the season card prices were increased, CM should probably have refused to deal with the Away Tickets issues, but it’s all very easy for me to say in hindsight.