Balotelli & City agree settlement!

pudge said:
shadygiz said:
pudge said:
He didn't miss any games for totting up of cards?

He was being fined for missing 11 games through the Liverpool and Arsenal red cards and his stamp on Parker


but thats against his unions rules, he had already been fined by the club for the cards
He missed a almost a third of the season due to his actions.

Surely a two week fine is acceptable?


and surely having the same basic rights as a murderer or rapist has is acceptable
 
Gelsons Dad said:
pudge said:
Gelsons Dad said:
He wasn't fined for missing games. There is no clause that allows a club to do that. He was find for conduct on the field. Dissent and recklessness I believe are the two areas the club can take action against.

You need to understand the situation better before commenting on it.
So a club can't take action against a player who is unavailable for almost a third of the season due to their own actions?

I think they can

The PFA think otherwise.
The PFA, which will be advising the 22-year-old and his representatives at the tribunal, claims City have breached established guidelines agreed by the union with the Football Association and the Premier League with the support of member clubs. The rules do not allow a club to fine a player for an accumulation of red and yellow cards, as has happened in Balotelli's case. Premier League guidelines only allow clubs to fine players for an accumulation of dissent and violent conduct charges and the PFA contests City's stance that Balotelli was in breach of contract last season.
Again, that is unfair on the club.

They pay near £20 million on a player, pay him £100k a week and he's unavailable for 11 games because of his own actions, and they can't fine him 2 weeks wages?
 
pudge said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
The cookie monster said:
So most people you go to city with week in week out like mario and his performances?
I edited my last comment.
I go when I can. Be honest I went last time and dont remember talking about him. I remember the crowd supporting him when he came on and half the stadium that does sing, singing his name

-- Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:48 pm --

pudge said:
So a club can't take action against a player who is unavailable for almost a third of the season due to their own actions?

I think they can
No they cant
Well then that's unfair to the club
No its not, its rules in place. They can fine him when he is banned like for the parker stamp but you cant turn up 7 months later and say "oi you missed 11 matches give us some money back". Rules are there to protect people from doing things like this to the lower league guys who struggle a living
 
shadygiz said:
pudge said:
shadygiz said:
but thats against his unions rules, he had already been fined by the club for the cards
He missed a almost a third of the season due to his actions.

Surely a two week fine is acceptable?


and surely having the same basic rights as a murderer or rapist has is acceptable
I addressed that point when you made it the first time
 
pudge said:
Gelsons Dad said:
pudge said:
So a club can't take action against a player who is unavailable for almost a third of the season due to their own actions?

I think they can

The PFA think otherwise.
The PFA, which will be advising the 22-year-old and his representatives at the tribunal, claims City have breached established guidelines agreed by the union with the Football Association and the Premier League with the support of member clubs. The rules do not allow a club to fine a player for an accumulation of red and yellow cards, as has happened in Balotelli's case. Premier League guidelines only allow clubs to fine players for an accumulation of dissent and violent conduct charges and the PFA contests City's stance that Balotelli was in breach of contract last season.
Again, that is unfair on the club.

They pay near £20 million on a player, pay him £100k a week and he's unavailable for 11 games because of his own actions, and they can't fine him 2 weeks wages?
Yes but what about the dodgy club owners in lower leagues trying to screw over a guy who earns £300 a week and has a family to feed. Its there for the little people but its has to encompass everyone
 
BluePurgatory said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
The cookie monster said:
So most people you go to city with week in week out like mario and his performances?
I edited my last comment.
I go when I can. Be honest I went last time and dont remember talking about him. I remember the crowd supporting him when he came on and half the stadium that does sing, singing his name

-- Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:48 pm --

pudge said:
So a club can't take action against a player who is unavailable for almost a third of the season due to their own actions?

I think they can
No they cant

You dont have to justify yourself to him BB I remember you on Blueview well before the takeover and your wasting your time with fudge you wont win and he will prb pm you to tell you off! lol.
^^^^ Are you reading SWPs Back
 
GStar said:
Two years with nothing to show for it, the novelty has worn off, its taken until the 11th hour to call the bluff on his and his legal team's 'willy waving'.

How many last chances, i'm not even sure the squad see him as an asset, more of a nuisance. The talent is there, the application isnt... he's wasting a squad space for someone who actually wants it.

Taking your own club to tribunal, when you're Mario Balotelli... it was never going to end well!

So you reckon Yaya who says the best is yet to come from Mario who was close to player of the Euro2012 finals is taking through his Yaya.
 
GStar said:
Two years with nothing to show for it, the novelty has worn off, its taken until the 11th hour to call the bluff on his and his legal team's 'willy waving'.

How many last chances, i'm not even sure the squad see him as an asset, more of a nuisance. The talent is there, the application isnt... he's wasting a squad space for someone who actually wants it.

Taking your own club to tribunal, when you're Mario Balotelli... it was never going to end well!


vinny, our captain, seemed to speak well of him the other night, in spite of redknaps quivering bottom lip
 
mancity1 said:
GStar said:
Two years with nothing to show for it, the novelty has worn off, its taken until the 11th hour to call the bluff on his and his legal team's 'willy waving'.

How many last chances, i'm not even sure the squad see him as an asset, more of a nuisance. The talent is there, the application isnt... he's wasting a squad space for someone who actually wants it.

Taking your own club to tribunal, when you're Mario Balotelli... it was never going to end well!

So you reckon Yaya who says the best is yet to come from Mario who was close to player of the Euro2012 finals is taking through his Yaya.
Yes
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
pudge said:
Gelsons Dad said:
The PFA think otherwise.
Again, that is unfair on the club.

They pay near £20 million on a player, pay him £100k a week and he's unavailable for 11 games because of his own actions, and they can't fine him 2 weeks wages?
Yes but what about the dodgy club owners in lower leagues trying to screw over a guy who earns £300 a week and has a family to feed. Its there for the little people but its has to encompass everyone
Again, if the player is responsible for missing games and being unavailable for selection.

It's unfair that the club can't take action
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.