Balotelli (continued - bust up with Mancini pg 18)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Looks like it was Mancini who lost it but hardly surprising. His psychological investment in Balotelli has gone tits up and one of them has to go.

Which one? One has a vital role in attempting to lead us to a second Prem title. The other is a circus sideshow.

Arrivederci Mario.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Manc in London said:
Didsbury Dave said:
Well if we are the only training ground with photographer access(and I don't believe that for a second) our manager should be acutely aware of the consequences of his actions.

The fact that he bought and stood by this fucking bell end of a player makes him accountable too.

They are a pair of idiots who can't control themselves properly when the going gets tough. But Mancini is the manager and is expected to have more gravitas.

You can paint this any way you want but the truth is plain to see. And I believe our new leadership may look upon this as symptomatic of internal problems at the club.

Do you ever get bored of criticising Mancini?

Any poster on this forum could have written that and posted it for you in your absence.
Nope. When he fucks up i will call him on it. Unlike you and many others who will do anything to maintain this bullshit St Bob image.

And you can pair up. And bring someone else along. And you can bring your fucking dinner if you like. Coz you'll fucking need it when I've finished with you.

Crying with tears of laughter at this.

Bravo Dave, bravo pmsl ;-)
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Didsbury Dave said:
And you can pair up. And bring someone else along. And you can bring your fucking dinner if you like. Coz you'll fucking need it when I've finished with you.

url
I am going to use John Sitton quotes every time I get into a row on here from now on.

"And I can see a man, who looks like me, with a voice like me, on this forum on Monday and he's saying..."
 
forevermancity said:
levets said:
Didsbury Dave said:
Bang on the fucking money mate. In the full knowledge that cameras were there too. The man's temper is a major problem , as is his clown of a protege, and has once again dragged the clubs name through the mire.

It shows the immense pressure he is under. What a stupid thing to do.

To suggest that Mancini damages our brand is frankly the most fucking stupidest thing I've ever read on here... The 3 trophies we've won under his tenure have enhanced our brand tenfold... at least! Fucking calm down lads FFS!

two prime examples over the past week:

putting information into the public domain about RVP rejecting us....no need whatso ever. nothing positive was gained...the whole footballing world now knows that he joined utd over us.

this today, could easily have been avoided. Eyewitness reports say that mario's initial tackle wasnt too bad....mancini makes a meal of it and the whole footballing world is talking about city in a bad light.

a brand is so much more than trophies.
mancini did not say he chose Man Utd over us. He said that he was close to joining City earlier in the Summer. Two different matters entirely. I don't know what happened and it's off topic, but you are making a big assumption.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
robbieh said:
Manc in London said:
Do you ever get bored of criticising Mancini?

Any poster on this forum could have written that and posted it for you in your absence.


What a daft question? It´s his life blood. What worries me is what happens to Didsbury when Mancini goes.

Will he spontaneously combust with joy or will he just carry on as normal and just switch to some other target. My bettings the latter. Which will be music to our ears as however ridiculous he appears he does provide most of us with some fun.

Yeah mate. It's my fault we will be all over the tabloids again tomorrow.

Didn´t say it was, clearly Mancini and Balotelli have more impact at our club and nationally that you do. Was just pointing out that you do manage to spend a lot of you valuable time slagging the manager from obscure angles that even pythagoras would have been proud of.
 
117 M34 said:
I think too many on here are too pro-mario or anti-mario to see the wood for the trees.

I'm certainly not his biggest fan, and to be honest think he is more trouble than he is worth, but we need to look at this incident in a bit more isolation to judge it.

He made a bad tackle on Sinclair, which player hasn't made a bad challenge in training? If we were all watching training (which sounds like it could actually be possible to do) and was sinclair with the ball and mario not bother to challenge him, everyone would be screaming 'lazy,' 'doesn't care,' 'not interested' etc.
He made a challenge, which was probably not the best, but which striker can tackle?

Mancini has had a go at him, we don't know if this was a reasonable and justified 'go' or not, and mario has gesticulated at him. How many times have we seen mancini do that to him and othe players? Does he have a case to argue when someone does it back to him?

From all of the pictures it seems than mancini was the aggressor, yet mario gets all the blame, because he did what? Maybe threw his arms in the air and said shut up, maybe more, but nobody on here knows so how can anyone be so critical without knowing the facts?

This may seem very anti-mancini and pro-mario but it isn't meant to be as I'm of the opposite belief.
Lets just wait for some more facts before hanging anyone.

How do you or anyone on here know if Mario was even trying in training, and he put in a lazy cant be arsed tackle because he couldn't really be bothered trying ? And that really lit the fuse of Mancini. We don't so none of can make assumptions. But the fact is he's shit !!
 
Dave S said:
levets said:
forevermancity said:
two prime examples over the past week:

putting information into the public domain about RVP rejecting us....no need whatso ever. nothing positive was gained...the whole footballing world now knows that he joined utd over us.

this today, could easily have been avoided. Eyewitness reports say that mario's initial tackle wasnt too bad....mancini makes a meal of it and the whole footballing world is talking about city in a bad light.

a brand is so much more than trophies.

How does RVP joining united damage our brand.....

Seriously... if you think Mancini damages our brand, you have no idea about branding....
Too many people on here have no fukcing idea about anything tbh. Least of all football.


brilliant
 
Unknown_Genius said:
Two guys shove each other. Big deal. They'll cool down, and it will all be water under the bridge. You would think somebody could have been killed.
erm yes when it is a manager and a very volatile player

when beckham was getting too big for his boots, ferguson booted him out. Same with Van Nistlerooy. Sometimes there is a level that shouldnt be crossed, and the best managers make sure that they never are.

Tevez and Balotelli should have been booted out imo. Tevez for going on holiday whilst City were fighting for champions league survival, and Balotelli for being just an idiot. He clearly isnt committed to City therefore why should he be there?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.