Balotelli,Time to cash in?

pudge said:
Mancio said:
pudge said:
There was never any intention to get the ball...

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftp4SdbMolU[/youtube]


he got the ball. are you blind mate ?
Yeah, song clipped the ball up, yet Mario raises his foot to Song's knee while the ball's still on the ground..

Are you deluded, mate? Horrible challenge, the other way about and you would hunt Song down

Then how about the Kiev sending off, defend that one? The ball had long gone before Mario raised his foot to the players CHEST. He also issued an apology afterwards so I can't wait to hear your defence of this one..

the kiev one is an even worst wrong from the refere. mario was already flying in the air and the fucking kiev's cheat maliciously put is body in the only one place where mario can land.
 
pudge said:
Maybe because Mario raises his foot while the balls on the ground...

Leg breaker
No, he makes contact with the ball first and then follows through - the clue is when the ball goes in the opposite direction without Song backheeling it. It's a poor challenge but to say there's no intent to get the ball is complete bullshit. He got the ball.
 
Skashion said:
pudge said:
Maybe because Mario raises his foot while the balls on the ground...

Leg breaker
No, he makes contact with the ball first and the follows through - the clue is when the ball goes in the opposite direction without song backheeling it. It's a poor challenge but to say there's no intent to get the ball is complete bullshit. He got the ball.
He may have made contact with the ball, but I maintain it was more luck than intent. Song chips the ball up.

And Mancio, regarding that last post..... are you serious??
 
pudge said:
Skashion said:
pudge said:
Maybe because Mario raises his foot while the balls on the ground...

Leg breaker
No, he makes contact with the ball first and the follows through - the clue is when the ball goes in the opposite direction without song backheeling it. It's a poor challenge but to say there's no intent to get the ball is complete bullshit. He got the ball.
He may have made contact with the ball, but I maintain it was more luck than intent. Song chips the ball up.

And Mancio, regarding that last post..... are you serious??


yes I'm. and the more you go on the more i have to believe you need glasses.
 
pudge said:
He may have made contact with the ball, but I maintain it was more luck than intent. Song chips the ball up.

And Mancio, regarding that last post..... are you serious??
You'll find a man guilty on that will you. Your guesswork that it's more luck than intent?

There's only one instance where I find Balotelli guilty of being malicious and that's Sweden, others are late dangerous challenges but with no intent, and some just never were bookings.
 
Mancio said:
pudge said:
Skashion said:
No, he makes contact with the ball first and the follows through - the clue is when the ball goes in the opposite direction without song backheeling it. It's a poor challenge but to say there's no intent to get the ball is complete bullshit. He got the ball.
He may have made contact with the ball, but I maintain it was more luck than intent. Song chips the ball up.

And Mancio, regarding that last post..... are you serious??


yes I'm. and the more you go on the more i have to believe you need glasses.
Mario issued an apology after that tackle (Kiev), hence acknowledging how poor it was.

YOU are the one who needs glasses along with removing your tongue from Mario's ass.
 
Skashion said:
pudge said:
He may have made contact with the ball, but I maintain it was more luck than intent. Song chips the ball up.

And Mancio, regarding that last post..... are you serious??
You'll find a man guilty on that will you. Your guesswork that it's more luck than intent?

There's only one instance where I find Balotelli guilty of being malicious and that's Sweden, others are late dangerous challenges but with no intent, and some just never were bookings.


i've to agree on the sweden one. anyway hardly a leg breaker......

de jong broke a couple of legs AFAIK , but i don't call him killer.
 
Skashion said:
pudge said:
He may have made contact with the ball, but I maintain it was more luck than intent. Song chips the ball up.

And Mancio, regarding that last post..... are you serious??
You'll find a man guilty on that will you. Your guesswork that it's more luck than intent?

There's only one instance where I find Balotelli guilty of being malicious and that's Sweden, others are late dangerous challenges but with no intent, and some just never were bookings.
There's as much proof for my claim that it was luck as there is for yours of intent..

But we've moved on from that as we will continue going round in circles
 
pudge said:
Mancio said:
pudge said:
He may have made contact with the ball, but I maintain it was more luck than intent. Song chips the ball up.

And Mancio, regarding that last post..... are you serious??


yes I'm. and the more you go on the more i have to believe you need glasses.
Mario issued an apology after that tackle (Kiev), hence acknowledging how poor it was.

YOU are the one who needs glasses along with removing your tongue from Mario's ass.


mario issued an apology everytime mancini asked him to do it. rightly.

tevez no. unfortunally.
 
Mancio said:
Skashion said:
pudge said:
He may have made contact with the ball, but I maintain it was more luck than intent. Song chips the ball up.

And Mancio, regarding that last post..... are you serious??
You'll find a man guilty on that will you. Your guesswork that it's more luck than intent?

There's only one instance where I find Balotelli guilty of being malicious and that's Sweden, others are late dangerous challenges but with no intent, and some just never were bookings.


i've to agree on the sweden one. anyway hardly a leg breaker......

de jong broke a couple of legs AFAIK , but i don't call him killer.
I don't call Mario a killer either...

And this COULD have broken Song's leg, intentional or not;

Balotelli_Strikes_Song.jpg
<br /><br />-- Jun 30th, '12, 20:37 --<br /><br />
Mancio said:
pudge said:
Mancio said:
yes I'm. and the more you go on the more i have to believe you need glasses.
Mario issued an apology after that tackle (Kiev), hence acknowledging how poor it was.

YOU are the one who needs glasses along with removing your tongue from Mario's ass.


mario issued an apology everytime mancini asked him to do it. rightly.

tevez no. unfortunally.
Tevez did issue an apology, eventually.

But how you can defend that challenge when even Mario couldn't is a little strange.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.