Balotelli's agent.

BlueRiz said:
Crouchinho said:
The fact that City aren't appealing shows he's guilty. It's blatant and there for everybody to see.

If Webb had sent him off I bet the ban would be less? I don't know how that works.

Or it could be that after the Vinny appeal was turned down whilst being so confident about it + the fact the FA have said we can add an extra game if its a frivy appeal, they could be thinking we will take the lesser or the 2 evils.

The Kompany one was ridiculous. Their has been some dodgy decisions from the FA so far.

Balotelli one was 100% correct. I'm still surprised people are defending him when City won't appeal it either.

I don't really pay much attention to agents, they only care about themselves. I doubt he wants to leave and I doubt very much Mancini would sell
 
The Kompany one was ridiculous. Their has been some dodgy decisions from the FA so far.

Balotelli one was 100% correct. I'm still surprised people are defending him when City won't appeal it either.

I don't really pay much attention to agents, they only care about themselves. I doubt he wants to leave and I doubt very much Mancini would sell[/quote]



Totally agreed mate how kompany got that red is a joke. Don't slag his agent pal I've been called a rag said i am embarrassing for telling Mario agent to stop talking. It doesn't help Mario or the club does it. Yeah Mario is such a great player but how people can justifie that stamp is beyond me. One day i hope he learns
 
Marios agent is right on all counts

Howard Webb.........Coward

Harry Redknapp.......Hypocrite and Thief

FA...............Prejudice

Highlighted on Sky Sports news by following up immediately by Crouch deliberately and cowardly attempting to gauge out an opponents eye....from behind. NO ACTION TO BE TAKEN.

Makes you proud to be English eh.
 
Crouchinho said:
BlueRiz said:
Crouchinho said:
The fact that City aren't appealing shows he's guilty. It's blatant and there for everybody to see.

If Webb had sent him off I bet the ban would be less? I don't know how that works.

Or it could be that after the Vinny appeal was turned down whilst being so confident about it + the fact the FA have said we can add an extra game if its a frivy appeal, they could be thinking we will take the lesser or the 2 evils.

The Kompany one was ridiculous. Their has been some dodgy decisions from the FA so far.

Balotelli one was 100% correct. I'm still surprised people are defending him when City won't appeal it either.

I don't really pay much attention to agents, they only care about themselves. I doubt he wants to leave and I doubt very much Mancini would sell

You keep missing the point don't you? What Manchester City are saying is that they reluctantly accept Mario will be banned for 4 games, not because he is gulity but because they know Webb has obviously changed his story to allow the FA to charge him. There is no point fighting a losing battle when the people who are supposed to govern the law move the goalposts to satisfy their own biased agenda. When justice is impossible then you might as well accept the punishment and have a player lost for 4 games instead of 6 or 8 games.
 
have to agree with mario's agent on his last point,regarding looking to appeal,when if you do you can end up with a further ban, just does'nt make sense,then again the fa does'nt make sense the majorityof the time...
 
Cookieproof said:
Crouchinho said:
BlueRiz said:
Or it could be that after the Vinny appeal was turned down whilst being so confident about it + the fact the FA have said we can add an extra game if its a frivy appeal, they could be thinking we will take the lesser or the 2 evils.

The Kompany one was ridiculous. Their has been some dodgy decisions from the FA so far.

Balotelli one was 100% correct. I'm still surprised people are defending him when City won't appeal it either.

I don't really pay much attention to agents, they only care about themselves. I doubt he wants to leave and I doubt very much Mancini would sell

You keep missing the point don't you? What Manchester City are saying is that they reluctantly accept Mario will be banned for 4 games, not because he is gulity but because they know Webb has obviously changed his story to allow the FA to charge him. There is no point fighting a losing battle when the people who are supposed to govern the law move the goalposts to satisfy their own biased agenda. When justice is impossible then you might as well accept the punishment and have a player lost for 4 games instead of 6 or 8 games.

spot on, thank you!!
 
Crouchinho said:
The fact that City aren't appealing shows he's guilty. It's blatant and there for everybody to see.

If Webb had sent him off I bet the ban would be less? I don't know how that works.
How can you be sure we aren't appealing spud?

Thanks for the 8 goals and six points
 
Mario only has himself to blame I'm afraid. He's entertaining but every time he plays I'm terrified he'll get sent off.
 
mario has to go play in a club that has the power to protect him.

Inter had not, and the City is proving to not have it.

there are only 4 clubs in the world who have the strength to protect him, scum, Bayern, Real Madrid and AC Milan, unfortunally.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.