twinkletoes
Well-Known Member
Re: Barclays caught fiddling!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pywh-RkdK8[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pywh-RkdK8[/youtube]
smudgedj said:
twinkletoes said:Here's a petition calling for a Leveson style enquiry into the banking sector
<a class="postlink" href="http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/35421" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/35421</a>
Halfpenny said:What have the Tories got to fear from a judge-led inquiry? The situation in the Commons right now is exactly why a parliamentary inquiry should not happen. Why? Ridiculous shouting matches on both sides, political point-scoring, the blame game. The Tories are pinning this on Labour, while at the same time glossing over the issue that they called for LESS regulation during the course of Labour's term in office. We hear it all the time; ordinary members of the public do not trust politicians, they trust them nearly as little as they trust bankers. That's exactly why a parliamentary inquiry will not be seen as legitimate. An investigation into a group of people they don't trust, by another group of people they don't trust.
This needs to be a judge-led enquiry, because a parliamentary inquiry would require the support of both parties and a consensus position, free of political point-scoring and opportunism. It patently has none of those things. Both sides are trying to make political capital out of it, and cooperation is quite clearly going to be impossible.
lloydie said:Halfpenny said:What have the Tories got to fear from a judge-led inquiry? The situation in the Commons right now is exactly why a parliamentary inquiry should not happen. Why? Ridiculous shouting matches on both sides, political point-scoring, the blame game. The Tories are pinning this on Labour, while at the same time glossing over the issue that they called for LESS regulation during the course of Labour's term in office. We hear it all the time; ordinary members of the public do not trust politicians, they trust them nearly as little as they trust bankers. That's exactly why a parliamentary inquiry will not be seen as legitimate. An investigation into a group of people they don't trust, by another group of people they don't trust.
This needs to be a judge-led enquiry, because a parliamentary inquiry would require the support of both parties and a consensus position, free of political point-scoring and opportunism. It patently has none of those things. Both sides are trying to make political capital out of it, and cooperation is quite clearly going to be impossible.
I suspect that they dont want a repeat of the Leveson enquiry and the fact that it will reveal a closer relationship with the Bankers (who represent over 50% of their funding) than they would care to admit in public.