allblackcitizen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 1,867
Soulboy said:moomba said:Can't see any benefit at all in this, and unless the stories like this and about the Adebayor deal are countered by the club (I'm hoping they're not true) we're in real danger of being seen as a soft touch for future transfers.
That's my fear as well. We have set ourselves up as a charity rather than a business by the looks of it!
I'm all for giving Bellamy a free transfer... if that means the contract is cancelled. But if it means we're ALSO paying him off, that's madness.
Same for Adebayor. Loan him out by all means, but not if it costs us money. However, I am more confident that the Adebayor deal will see us paying none of Ade's wages. Or so it's been claimed.
I did say at the start of this transfer window that Bellamy was only ever going to go on a free, that talk of us getting £4m was fanciful.
I just hope the club haven't created an image where we "give away" all the players out of favour. At some point we have to make a stand and get some money in![/quote]
I'm afraid this image will continue to gain force for as long as we so publicly and obviously freeze out players who are no longer in the manager's plans. The fact that they are no longer in the manager's plans is fine in itself, but I don't agree with them being ostracised so publicly by the club. It's bad on a human level (until a player is transferred he should be part of the club and treated as such) and it's bad on a business level (every other club are encouraged to take advantage of a situation we have created unnecessarily). Bellamy, Bridge, even RSC have some value to other clubs and we shouldn't be subsidising it. Hell, the rags somehow managed to get £3m for Obertan and Bellamy, even at 30+ and with 2 dodgy knees, is twice the player that wierdo will ever be.
Of course, it's also encouraged by the universal knowledge that ultimately the Sheikh don't exactly need the money.