LOL
What a fucking goon.
This is the shittest signing in the history of the club.
He was arrested so he was suspended without pay. He was never sentenced so will reclaim the wages that we have had sat in the bank. This will go away with a payment nowhere near the full amount because of the gross mis-conduct etc on his side.
Yeah but we're talking about official court decisions and lawful compensations, not about my or your opinions of the guy.I’m not even arsed about his legal troubles. The **** deserves fuck all purely on the basis that he’s totally dog shit at football and acted like a complete bell end.
Balotelli without the talent.
And of course he wasn’t shit before his injuries. I think they fucked him up psychologically. Never anywhere near even half the player afterwards.Yea but we bought him so him being shit wasn’t his fault haha
It’ll depend on the small print of his contract.He was arrested, and therefore surely unable to fulfill his contractual obligations. Of being available to play for the club. Which I would imagine is different for arrest or conduct than for injury etc.
I'm sure when the club decided not to pay him, they would have known where they stood whichever way the verdict went.
By the same logic of him suing the club, the club could sue him for loss of transfer value, for example.
It is a band move from him, but at the same time, he will be taking advice, and somebody somewhere will think he has a case.
I am fine with however this plays out, it is a matter of law and how people that deal with it apply it. I think the club probably did the only thing they could have done.
He - and probably his agent too - are probably rich guys and will have taken advice from lawyers - and that may have been free of charge anyway as the PFA might cover some or all of his legal bills - providing that there is advice that he has a reasonably strong claim. I doubt very much that it'll ever get to a court hearing.He was arrested, and therefore surely unable to fulfill his contractual obligations. Of being available to play for the club. Which I would imagine is different for arrest or conduct than for injury etc.
I'm sure when the club decided not to pay him, they would have known where they stood whichever way the verdict went.
By the same logic of him suing the club, the club could sue him for loss of transfer value, for example.
It is a bad move from him, but at the same time, he will be taking advice, and somebody somewhere will think he has a case.
I am fine with however this plays out, it is a matter of law and how people that deal with it apply it. I think the club probably did the only thing they could have done.