If he claimed against the people who accused him, there's a much stronger chance he could lose.I was thinking the same. Shouldnt Mendy be claiming against the people who falsely accused him ?
He couldnt work because HE broke the bail agreement, why would City first him being a knobhead
I take it you're not in HR?Fucking low life
His behaviour off the field alone dictates he should just fuck off and be extremely grateful not to be doing porridge long term….and that’s leaving out how crap he was on the pitch.
Basically injured half the time (as a result of a crap bit of defending) during which the club stood by him. Then crap the few times he appeared followed by dragging City through the mud for his behaviour with women.
The guy should be grateful the club isn’t suing him for damaging our image.
Sincerely hope we fuck him off big time!
No. The court did, and he did. He breached his bail conditions. CPS didnt stop him working, he could have carried on until he breached his bail. That is on himWe should have a counter claim , we paid over £50m for this clown and his actions made him wothtless , he had two years left on his contract when he got nicked and some idiot would have paid £20m for him. Perhaps he should go after his accusers for the money he lost or the CPS , we didnt stop him working they did , but we know his accusers havent got a pot to piss in , so his lwayer is coming after the money, he can go and get f*cked.
Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!SIGN UP