avoidconfusion
Well-Known Member
We only paid 3.5m for him and to be honest he wasn't that great. :)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
benji to sunderland
- Thread starter bizzbo
- Start date
The Fat el Hombre
Well-Known Member
SELL SELL SELL
Cityisland
Well-Known Member
Ramdothy said:lionheart said:Why? Everybody here says he is not good enough.
i mean the price ..
1.5m do not make sense
at least 4m
He is never worth 4mil. He is 31 and out of contact in the summer. Oh, and he is also shit. 1.5mil sounds like a good deal to me. Just clearing out some deadwood.
BlueDejong
Well-Known Member
09.51 Sky Sports News understands West Ham United have ended their interest in signing Manchester City striker Benjani amid reports that Roberto Mancini did not want to let the forward go.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.skysports.com/football/transfer_clockwatch/0,23710,14896,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.skysports.com/football/trans ... 96,00.html</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.skysports.com/football/transfer_clockwatch/0,23710,14896,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.skysports.com/football/trans ... 96,00.html</a>
bluemoondays
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 2,435
I'd pay Sunderland £1.5m for them to take him. Never understood why we bought him in the first place and if it wasn't for the goal at the swamp no-one would be bothered in the slightest.
Us buying him gave Redknapp the money to go for Defoe, why the hell we didn't just get Defoe I'll never understand unless we tried and he didn't want to move up north.
Us buying him gave Redknapp the money to go for Defoe, why the hell we didn't just get Defoe I'll never understand unless we tried and he didn't want to move up north.
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
bluemoondays said:I'd pay Sunderland £1.5m for them to take him. Never understood why we bought him in the first place and if it wasn't for the goal at the swamp no-one would be bothered in the slightest.
Us buying him gave Redknapp the money to go for Defoe, why the hell we didn't just get Defoe I'll never understand unless we tried and he didn't want to move up north.
see what I mean about nitwits
Ricktee76
Well-Known Member
BlueDejong said:09.51 Sky Sports News understands West Ham United have ended their interest in signing Manchester City striker Benjani amid reports that Roberto Mancini did not want to let the forward go.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.skysports.com/football/transfer_clockwatch/0,23710,14896,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.skysports.com/football/trans ... 96,00.html</a>
I'll take that as were not in for any strikers then.
Big Dave Watson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 2,376
There was a clause though where we had to pay as mich again if he completed a number of games. I think it was 75.avoidconfusion said:We only paid 3.5m for him and to be honest he wasn't that great. :)
dannyboiblue
Well-Known Member
id keep him me, holds the ball up well and is strong doesnt score enough but always an ok player as back up, and 1.5m lol didnt we pay close to 8mill for him?
dannyboiblue
Well-Known Member
ahh was it only 3.5m we paid? oops lol